You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Art Plagiarism Case: yakubenko
@ilgiaguaro Are you saying that all these artists are plagiarism ???
Original photo:
Artwork, original:
• artist - nasty.a.art
• artist - green_ninja_6
• artist - tati_guro
• artist - olrian
• artist - kroninaekaterina
• artist - vangozhenka
• artist - bakhanar
Are you saying that all these artists are plagiarism ???








if they have not mentioned the source yes
They all draw from photographs, not from drawings by another artist. But if the artist painted a picture from his own imagination, and someone sketched from his picture, then this is plagiarism! And you can draw from photos!
isn't the photographer an artist?
The artist is not a photographer!
yes, photographers are clearly artists too.
So if I paint a bridge I have to source the architect? This is moronic
@vladivostok hahah)
Clearly, reproducing a copyrighted photograph is a derivative work of it, and according to the law the user needs permission from the author to monetize derivative works in addition to, of course, crediting the author of the photograph. If you paint a bridge thats very different, for architectural copyright law is different:
ты настолько неразумный!