You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Plagiarism Case #39 - Caso de Plagio #39 - @zeleiracordero
@jaguar.force
I come to prove that you are wrong in your hurried judgment.
To consider a text as plagiarism, it must contain at least 20% of the plagiarized text of another article.
This one of @zeleiracordero only contains a 6% of plagiarism and a 94% it's unique.
This is my own research:
You can check by yourselves, using the same tool, here:
https://www.duplichecker.com/
So, you should apologize to @zeleiracordero and whitelist her.
You have no idea what you are talking about, no serious cleaner uses those shit apps you mention, thats for amateurs. if it was only that part that is rephrased the author would have cited it, in all likelyhood the whole article is rephrased. Additionally the author has a long history of plagiarism, formerly with poems in weku, now she is a scientist.....
Who seem to have no idea of plagiarism are you.
You just took 2 paragraphs of the entire article, arguing she's a plagiarist when, in this concrete case, not a 6% of the entire article matches with the original.
These apps are made and focused only for that purpose and I really can say that I trust it more than I trust your hurried work, when even those 2 Spanish paragraphs have not much coincidence and are a clear paraphrase.