The Fed Is Playing Chess. The Market Is Playing Chicken.

Powell stood in front of a Harvard economics class on Monday and said, more or less, that the Fed is content to observe a 55% monthly oil price surge with the detached calm of a man watching rain from a window. "Monetary policy works with long and variable lags, famously," he said, "and so, by the time the effects of a tightening in monetary policy takes effect, the oil price shock is probably long gone." Soothing words. Reasonable even, in a vacuum. But we are not in a vacuum. We are in a world where Brent crude soared roughly 55% in March alone — a record for the contract dating back to its inception in 1988 — and where the most important oil shipping route on the planet has been rendered essentially impassable.

The logic Powell is deploying is classic central bank doctrine: supply shocks are transitory, don't tighten into weakness, let the shock pass. The 1970s playbook, in reverse. The problem is that this particular supply shock isn't a tanker delay or a bad winter storm. The war in the Middle East is creating what the IEA has called the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market, with crude and oil product flows through the Strait of Hormuz plunging from around 20 million barrels per day to a trickle. This isn't transitory in the hurricane sense. This is structural until a bullet or a deal changes it.

And so the Fed sits. As of April 2, the CME FedWatch Tool showed a 98% probability that the Fed holds at its April 28–29 meeting. That probability is less a sign of market confidence and more a sign of market paralysis. What do you do when your tools are irrelevant to the problem in front of you? You wait. You give speeches at Harvard. You say "we just don't know" approximately eleven times at a press conference and hope that uncertainty sounds like wisdom.

Here is what we do know. Trump delivered another address Wednesday night that flipped the market's mid-week optimism on its head — after cultivating a narrative that the conflict would soon end, he said goals had not yet been achieved, that strikes on Iran's electricity plants were possible, and that he might bomb the country back to the stone age. S&P futures are down roughly 95 points this morning. WTI is now trading at $113 per barrel, and the ten-year Treasury is ticking upward again, settling yesterday at 4.31% with the thirty-year at 4.88% — spreads that reflect a bond market slowly pricing in the uncomfortable possibility that inflation doesn't just spike and reverse, but embeds.

That is the real risk nobody wants to say plainly. Bloomberg Economics' big data tracker put US CPI for March at 3.4% year-over-year, a marked increase from 2.4% in February, and the Iran war only began on February 28th. March's gasoline effects are just starting to show up in the numbers. April's will be worse. AAA's daily tracker put the national average for regular gasoline at $3.842 a gallon in mid-March, up about 92 cents from a month earlier — and that was before WTI crossed $110. Consumer expectations, once unanchored, are notoriously hard to re-anchor. Powell knows this better than anyone. He watched the "transitory" error cost the Fed two years of credibility.

His current bet is a variation of the same wager: look through the shock, pray it ends. The Fed's formal projections still pencil in one rate cut this year and show core inflation back down to 2.7% by December — a forecast that requires either a rapid ceasefire or a considerable amount of institutional faith in things working out. The bond market, for its part, has already quietly dropped its two-cuts-in-2026 consensus and is inching toward zero.

What makes this moment genuinely different from past oil shocks is that the supply disruption is both larger and more durable than anything we've seen since the 1970s, while the Fed is simultaneously navigating a leadership transition. Kevin Warsh, nominated to succeed Powell, comes in with a reputation as a monetary hawk into a scenario where PCE inflation is projected to climb back toward 3.5% — and where hawkishness and political loyalty to a White House that wants rates at 1% are not obviously compatible objectives. The next Fed chair, whoever actually sits in that chair in May, inherits a situation where both tools of monetary policy look inadequate: hiking into an energy shock crushes demand without restoring supply; cutting to soften the growth blow risks embedding the inflation. The range of possibilities now includes no rate cuts in 2026 at all, and the tail scenarios include something far less pleasant.

Meanwhile, oil industry executives and analysts are warning that the Strait of Hormuz needs to be reopened by mid-April, or supply disruptions will worsen significantly. Polymarket now gives an 80.5% probability that the Strait will not return to normal traffic by the end of April. April 6th — Trump's stated deadline for Iran to comply or face strikes on Kharg Island — is three days away. Iran has denied any negotiations are underway. Goldman Sachs has a WTI target of $105 for April under a relatively optimistic scenario; under a pessimistic one, Brent could surpass its 2008 all-time high if the disruption runs ten weeks.

Powell's "wait and see" framing works beautifully if the Strait opens in two weeks and gasoline falls back to $3.20 by June. It becomes a historical cautionary tale if it doesn't. The Fed knows this. Markets know this. The difference is the Fed is institutionally required to project calm, and the market is institutionally required to price reality.

Right now, those two requirements are pulling in opposite directions. One of them has to give.

---

Published April 3, 2026