The Strait is Closed and the Story Has Changed
The Strait is Closed and the Story Has Changed
March 10, 2026
Brent crude touched $119.50 a barrel on Monday morning before anyone on Wall Street had finished their first coffee. Not flirted with it. Hit it. The first time oil has punched above $100 since Russia rolled its tanks into Ukraine in February 2022, and the market spent roughly four hours trying to decide if it was real.
It's real.
Joint US-Israeli airstrikes on February 28th — Operation Epic Fury — assassinated Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and targeted Iranian military infrastructure. Iran's response was swift, missile-heavy, and aimed squarely at the one nerve it knew would produce screaming: it brought the Strait of Hormuz to an effective halt, threatening about one-fifth of the world's oil and LNG supply. Iraq, the UAE, and Kuwait — three of OPEC's biggest producers — cut their own output because crude is piling up with nowhere to go. Storage is full. Tankers won't move. The strait is a ghost town of expensive, stranded metal.
And still, somehow, the White House's opening response was a Truth Social post calling the oil spike "a very small price to pay."
The market begged to differ. Dow futures dropped more than 800 points. S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures both fell over 1.6%. Japan's Nikkei closed more than 5% lower after falling as much as 7% in early trading. South Korea's KOSPI was down 6%. European banks, airlines, industrials — everything that runs on cheap, predictable energy — bled out across the session. The STOXX Europe 600 has now shed over 5% in a week. The DAX dropped nearly 7%. Germany, France, Italy — all down sharply as energy prices surged and fears about prolonged inflation across the eurozone took hold.
What's remarkable isn't the violence of the move. It's how long markets spent pretending this wouldn't happen.
For the first week after the strikes, traders wore their sangfroid like a badge. Oil crept up — $72, then $80, then $93 by the Friday close — and the consensus was "contained." Strategic reserves. Rerouted cargoes. The classic "temporary disruption" framework that gets deployed every time something genuinely structural happens and nobody wants to reprice their book. As one energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth put it last week: "We've gone from traders with ice in their veins to traders with panic in their veins." By Sunday, that was the understatement of the year.
Now we're in the second week. Israel carried out strikes targeting Iranian oil infrastructure for the first time since the war began. The US ordered non-emergency government staff to leave Saudi Arabia. The US Embassy in Riyadh cited elevated risks from missile and drone attacks. That is not a de-escalation signal. The Qatari Energy Minister told the Financial Times that all regional producers could soon be forced into force majeure declarations, and that $150 crude is on the table. Rystad Energy has the same number circled if the strait stays effectively closed for four months.
The G7 is convening emergency calls about strategic reserve releases. The IEA is being wheeled out of storage alongside the barrels. These are the moves you make when the "this will blow over" trade is visibly losing.
The Jobs Report Nobody Wanted to Read
Meanwhile, back in the economic data dungeon, Friday's February payrolls report arrived looking like it had been mugged on the way in.
Nonfarm payrolls fell 92,000 — the third time in five months the economy has lost jobs — against a consensus estimate of 50,000 and well below January's downwardly-revised 126,000. The White House will reach for the Kaiser Permanente strike (which sidelined 30,000+ healthcare workers in California and Hawaii during the survey week) and severe winter weather as the explanatory exits. Both are real. Neither should entirely comfort you.
The three-month average nonfarm payroll gain now stands at less than 6,000 per month. The household survey suggests the number of employed individuals has declined by nearly 850,000 since November. Had labor force participation held steady, the unemployment rate would have topped 5%. Instead it came in at 4.4%, partly because over a million people simply stopped looking.
Federal government employment has fallen 330,000 since October 2024 — an 11% reduction — as the deferred resignation program and workforce consolidation chew through the public sector payroll. Information services: down. Transportation and warehousing: down 157,000 over the past year. Even healthcare — the category that basically was the jobs market in 2025 — turned negative this month.
Wages, perversely, held up. Average hourly earnings rose 0.4% on the month and 3.8% year-over-year, both a tenth above forecast. Which means you have a labor market that is visibly softening in quantity while prices remain sticky in quality. Every central banker's nightmare. Not stagflation — not yet — but definitely the anteroom.
The Fed meets March 18th. CME FedWatch puts the odds of a hold at 97.3%. The rate cut that was already a long shot before the Strait closed is now essentially priced out. This meeting is the first time the FOMC formally responds to both the February tariff shock and the Iran energy disruption in its projections and dot plot. The dot plot going from one cut to zero would not be surprising. Language hinting at "additional tightening if warranted" would crater risk assets for the rest of the week.
What Powell says on oil will matter enormously. The Fed has historically treated energy-driven inflation as transitory — something to "look through" in the parlance. But looking through a 50% oil move in ten days while unemployment climbs and wages stay warm requires a level of philosophical commitment that even the most devoted central banker would find strenuous.
Bitcoin's Confusing Relationship With a Hot War
Somewhere in all of this, Bitcoin is doing something genuinely strange.
BTC dropped from just under $68,000 to below $64,000 in the first 48 hours after the strikes — a 6% plunge. Then, when back-channel peace feelers from Iran surfaced through the New York Times, it clawed all the way back to $73,777. Now it's hovering around $67,000–$68,000, rangebound, twitching at every headline from the Gulf.
The war-is-bullish-for-Bitcoin thesis is circulating loudly. The argument has a logic to it: wars are expensive, deficit spending expands, the Fed eventually has to keep Treasury markets functioning, and the liquidity created by that process has historically been the single most reliable fuel for Bitcoin's price. Since the first strikes on Iran, BTC has actually gained 3.6% — which is either proof of concept or an artifact of the peace-feeler bounce, depending on your priors.
The honest version of this trade requires patience that most crypto participants don't possess. The Fed printing to finance a war is a 6-to-18 month thesis, not a 72-hour trade. And oil sitting above $80 for any sustained period is immediately inflationary in ways that force the Fed to stay hawkish, not go dovish — which is directly bearish for BTC in the short run. The Wintermute OTC desk put it cleanly: "If Brent stays above $80 for more than a few sessions, the re-inflation narrative hardens and the March rate cut that was already a long shot becomes impossible."
Brent is at $99 as I write this. Do the math.
The Multi-Variable Problem Nobody Is Pricing Cleanly
Here is the structural problem that nobody is pricing cleanly: this is a multi-variable shock arriving simultaneously.
You have an energy price spike. You have a softening labor market. You have a Fed that needs to hold rates to fight inflation but is watching a jobs report that suggests the economy may already be tipping. You have $15 global tariffs that haven't fully transmitted through to CPI yet. You have a US government spending aggressively on a military campaign that will cost somewhere between $40 and $95 billion before it's done. And you have a Treasury market that needs to absorb all that issuance while yields are already elevated.
Treasury Secretary Bessent described the current "balance sheet function" as something "no one understands." Reassuring.
The futures curve is the sanity check here. If the long end starts materially repricing — if the market begins treating this oil shock as structural rather than transitory — the whole risk asset framework shifts. In 2022, Brent surged near $130 and the disruption turned out to be effectively permanent as sanctions locked out Russian supply. The Fed was already miles behind on inflation and had no choice but to hike aggressively. Right now, the futures curve is still implying traders see an expiration date on this disruption — the front month is up sharply, but the back of the curve hasn't fully capitulated.
The critical variable remains what it has been since February 28th: duration. A three-week war ends with a relief rally across every asset class. Three months of closed strait and you are in a genuinely different macroeconomic world — one where the Fed's choices are all bad, US consumers are paying $4.50 at the pump heading into midterm season, and the "soft landing" narrative is not so much landing softly as augering into a hillside.
The grace period ended Monday morning somewhere around $119 a barrel. What comes next depends on whether diplomacy or escalation wins the next two weeks.
Bets are open. Position accordingly.
Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.