Atheists do not exist

in #atheism6 years ago

magic-cube-cube-puzzle-play-54101.jpeg

What do all atheists (a faith-based belief system based around Man as God) have in common? They desperately need to tell everyone about it.

Atheists, come across indoctrinated to me.

‘Atheist’ is a fake term. You can’t be an atheist. Being an atheist is basically saying there is no higher power (God) and nothing after death. This means atheism is the most indoctrinated of all belief systems. Atheists like to lump any argument against them under a form of atheism – as per this article http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=6487.

An Atheist is a made up, impossible and nonsensical term because it’s impossible to be one.

Why? Because people don’t know everything about the universe.

To claim that there is no higher power (also making sure they define that higher power within ultra tight parameters to suit their belief system (i.e. ‘fairy in the sky’) is a total absolute.

Saying with absolute certainty there is nothing after death is an absolute, especially when you have no comprehensive data to confirm or deny it.

We live is a world of classified information. Most of us can't even begin to form a burden of proof.

We live in a material world separate to our mind with only our mind's interpretations (beliefs) to help us make sense of it.

It's unfortunate but true. Hence people prefer to live in ignorance instead of inputting as much data into their system as can be handled, forcing the mind to 4D.

People with open minds don’t deal in absolutes, indoctrinated people do. And indoctrinated people will never upgrade to 4D. Atheists will never upgrade their minds to 4D. They refuse to look anywhere outside of mainstream science to fill their phanerons with.

Should we one day reach an ability to see in a resolution that expands our visual interpretation to 4D - how can we know if a 4D being is the god that created us?

Anyone with half a brain, and without arrogance is agnostic – not an atheist.

If you aren’t an indoctrinated pawn, you are agnostic, not the absolute atheist.

Catholic – believes in God
Agnostic – knows he doesn’t know everything
Atheist – knows with absolute confidence there is nothing greater than human knowledge, but changes every time the scientific community (fraught with corruption and multinational/government investment – and we all know how that goes) tells them.

They try and dance around the point. They say ‘oh we don’t believe in deities’ but everyone knows its total crap except the rest of the indoctrinated atheist community.

What trauma must you suffer to go from a place of wonder in things you do not understand, to an absolute BELIEF that nothing is there?

Unless you are an indoctrinated pawn with a faith-based belief in human gained data, when the greatest scientists themselves confess they don’t know, you are agnostic.

If you are an 'atheist' – you are one of the least critical thinkers on the planet and you should probably get out of your echo chamber.

Sadly monotheists are no better.

Multi-theism combined with solipsism is the only honest way to approach life and take humanity to 4D and beyond.

What say you?!

Sort:  

Hey man, being an atheist myself, having mostly atheist friends and family - allow me challange you on a few points:

it’s impossible to be one. Why? Because people don’t know everything about the universe.

This point could be valid if you judged all non-empirical-fact-based belief systems to have the same inherit flaw. Including every single type of theism. Man does not know everything but he has every right to have beliefs, even baseless ridiculous ones.

Also - one may argue that atheism is based, all of the atheists I know have never seen any proof for the kind of God that is described by the various types of theisms, they also have never seen any proof of the giant flying spaghetti monster - so they won't believe that either, even if they stumble on a book which is said to have been written by the spaghetti itself.

also making sure they define that higher power within ultra tight parameters to suit their belief system (i.e. ‘fairy in the sky’)

How else could you articles a sentence in which you try to explain what it is that you do not believe in? You have to be specific about what you don't believe.

In my definition of the term an atheist doesn't need to be believe that there's nothing after death, and no God watching our every step. But rather to not accept the theist view point. I've met very few people that believed with conviction that life is a meaningless mistake and all, but they were in an odd time in their life and it wasn't a perspective they held for long. I believe the technical term for people who hold no conviction for the nature of life and existence (rather than belief in the fatalistic absent of greater powers regardless of their nature) is non-theist. Is that you're point though? That we mistakenly call non-theists - atheists?

And why does the atheist more indoctrinated than the theist?

What's multitheism? Do you mean polytheism?

Loading...

@thefatgenie, I gave you an upvote on your first post! Please give me a follow and I will give you a follow in return!

Please also take a moment to read this post regarding bad behavior on Steemit.