Exactly. None of their arguments against hardforking for blocksize can stand on their own merits, hence the need to resort to heavy-handed censorship to push their narrative. It's painfully obvious that they are pursuing an agenda that has not been disclosed to the public - which may be as simple as they have patented SW (as a result they would very soon be in a position to start filing lawsuits against companies that violate their patent by creating SW transactions), or their ulterior motives may be more nefarious than that. I briefly outlined one possible endgame that could come from from a SegWit LN-enabled Bitcoin with 1MB blocks in my other comments in this thread.