The secret plan of the global elite regarding cryptocurrency

The interest in Bitcoin reached its climax. You can't access any website on the economy, listen to a podcast or watch a video about the Finance not to learn about the fast rise of the Bitcoin prices.
Maybe you are personally familiar with “bichenovii a millionaire,” there are those, however, who several years ago invested $50,000 in the cryptocurrency, and now his fortune exceeds $2 000 000. Such people really exist.
However, crypto-hysteria distracts you from the very unpleasant truth that nobody wants to talk about. If you look around, you will see many signs that indicate that governments, regulators, tax authorities and global elite going to commit murder cryptocurrency. The future of Bitcoin may appear before us in the form of a dystopia in which Big Brother controls the so-called “blockchain” and decides for you, when and how you can make the purchase or sale of cryptocurrency.
Moreover, the technology of cryptocurrency may be the mechanism by which the global elite will replace the current financial system based on the dollar.
In 1958, Mao Zedong, the leader of the Communist party of China, was in a confrontation with demoralized intellectuals and artists of the country who were sidelined from power by the Communists. In response to the situation, he announced the launch of a new policy of intellectual freedom.
Mao said that “a policy aimed at creating conditions for the blossoming of hundred flowers and hundred schools competition, designed to promote the development of arts and to promote the progress of science.”
This Declaration is known as the “Company of the hundred flowers.” The response to this Declaration was not long in coming.
After the incident did not come as a surprise to those familiar with the political methods of the government. As soon as intellectuals and artists have proved, for the secret police became easy to grab them, then part of the kill, and the portion to send in a “perevoplotilsya camp,” where the latter could learn ideological conformism.
The movement of the hundred flowers was a trap for those who believed in the state. This movement was a harbinger of a more violent and inclusive of the Cultural revolution, 1964-1974 years, which eclipsed all traces of the bourgeois culture of China and destroyed a large part of the historical heritage of the country.
Something similar is happening now with Bitcoin and the Technology of distributed registries (DLT). Government patiently watching to see how the technology of the blockchain is evolving beyond their control for the past eight years.
Libertarian adherents of the blockchain very happy about the lack of government control in this area. However, their celebration is premature, and their confidence in the sustainability of the systems established beyond the reach of governments, naive.
Governments do not like competition, especially when it comes to money. Governments know that they cannot stop the blockchain, but they do not want to do that. They only want to control it using regulation and taxation. They want to be able to investigate and be able to arrest and imprison those who refuse to obey government mandates, determining rules in the field of blockchain.
The blockchain does not exist in the air (despite the fact that one of the cryptocurrencies that name). This technology depends on the infrastructure, including servers, telecommunications networks, banking system, electricity transmission lines, all of that is subject to government control.
The largest group of companies whose activities are regulated by the government, said the development of the blockchain open source, which should become the uniform standard for all blockchain-based applications. This group includes JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, State Street, SWIFT, Cisco, Accenture, London Stock Exchange and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial. Thus, we are not talking about five guys in the hood, looking in my garage. We witness, as a government-corporate consortium takes control of this area.
Elite legislative institution, called the Commission on the harmonization of legislation (Uniform Law Commission), which develops model laws subsequently proposed for adoption in all fifty States, recently released its proposal under the title “Law on the unified regulation of businesses related to virtual currencies.”
This new law not only provides for a scheme of regulations for state regulators, but it will also be the basis for litigation involving private and group plaintiffs seeking to redress real or contrived damage resulting from the exchanges of the digital crrency. As soon as the proceedings of the anonymity will be forgotten.
Cryptocurrency and plan superelit
Take a look at the following sequential events:
August 1, 2017, the Commission on securities and stock exchanges issued a “manual on the regulation of the initial placement of coins,” which was the first step to fundraising through placement of new tokens is carried out only after the mandatory state registration.
1 Aug 2017 the World Economic Forum acceptable to the annual conference of superelit in Davos, published a document entitled “Four reasons to question the hype associated with bloccano.”
7 August 2017, China announced that it will start to use the blockchain for tax collection and issue of “electronic bills” for the citizens of the country.
But the most ominous seen intervention in the field of cryptocurrencies of the International Monetary Fund. In a special report, dated June of 2017, the IMF said the following:
“The technology of distributed registries (DLT), in particular, can cause changes in the financial sector... DLT may fall into the category of “not requiring approval” in the category “requiring permission”, depending on who the participants in the validation process based on consensus. Does not require DLT permissions allow everyone to read, carry out transactions and to participate in the validation process. These open schemes (which are the basis of Bitcoin, for example) can be very destructive if they are successfully implemented. On the contrary, require permission of the DLT, the validation process is controlled by the selected group of participants (“consortium”) or is controlled by a single entity (“private”), and therefore, this technology works like the familiar communication platform.”
Releases, the IMF should be translated by experts, because the Fund never uses in its reports to ordinary English, and the real message that they are always hidden between the lines. But the language of this release is extremely clear. The IMF prefers the “requires permission” scheme and does not favor “open circuits.” The IMF also favours control “selected group participants” or “single organization” and that the participants could be “everyone.”
This document should be seen as a first step the IMF in the direction of the existing form of world money, the Special Drawing Rights, to DLT platform, controlled by the Fund. Over time, all other forms of money will be banned.
Everything points to the fact that elite groups, including the IMF, JPMorgan, the company, the tax office, securities Commission and exchange Commission, preparing to end the free ecosystem of blockchain and replace it with “require permission” system, controlled by the “consortium.”
Big Brother comes to the blockchain.