RE: @preparedwombat loves to flag those who he disagrees with
Flagging is essentially booing, jeering or otherwise taking the piss or making a mockery of a message, just like the gif. That is essentially in turn freedom of expression, somehow this retard believes that free speech means people have to listen to you and can't make a mess of your grandstanding, as if they are compelled to refrain from expressing themselves. It's your voting power, if you disagree with something there's nothing wrong with curating such things as low quality, if it is beneath yourself to interact any more than that, unless it's not and you'd go further, or equally but more deviously if you would encourage such message only to set the person up for a public fail when you pull the rug from under them and point some damning questions and raise some important issues like "isn't flagging essentially expressing yourself, calling flagging censorship is calling curating censorship, and calling "censorship" on a platform built with the ethos of freedom and decentralization. If you merit the rewards, you should deserve the flags, it's not right that people sexualize children and you should be ire at that, equally it's not right to spread such hateful message and mask it in concern for the children.
fyi
Preaching your intolerant message will not be tolerated by the most tolerant.
It is strange that you would resteem it tho, since you are providing more visibility through that.
On the topic of flagging, I think it is OK as long as it is no auto flag and you think that the article is actually deliberate disinformation. Speaking of that did you see @elfspice vs establishment drama? That one feels a lot like censorship, but I have to admit that I don't know him well or his history on our platform, also if it is really only FUD he is promoting that would qualify as disinformation.
I don't know, I will have to look into it. I expect people to think about what promoting this nonsense of "race" superiority or even "purity" is accomplishing, I mean who will support these things on these nonsense grounds of "every race has it place", pun intended. Someone so insufferably intolerant and full of self important superiority over the dominion of what people and certain people can and cant do or can and can't be in, will not find support in a civil and wholesome community.
So you plan on PUNISHING them until they learned their lesson?
How did you and why did you conclude that I want to punish anyone?
isnt' a flag a sort of punishment for bad behavior?
You're reading into what I said and not actually what I said. I never said that people should flag him, or anything like that. I said that flagging is equal to booing, jeering.
Punishment is having such a castrated view of yourself, punishment is carrying that cross "YOU-DON'T-BELONG", and that punishment is worthy of pity indeed and I wouldn't wish that onto anyone.
Now you know what it feels like :P
Nope, you clearly were advocating punishment, another word for vengeance, and you equated restitution to slavery restitution and somehow thought you had any ground to call that restitution illegitimate in any way, which wasn't the point of saying that an alternative to punishment is restitution which you failed to grasp. Also in your view it's ok to kill someone if someone forces you and you shouldn't be judged for that, and if you kill for money then you are not worthy of a trial from what I read, more or less execution upon capture, dead or alive kind of justice. So no, you don't get to accuse me or insinuate I read into your comments or article and argued what I interpreted was in between the words, left unsaid, that is exactly what you did the first time when you tried to laugh at Anarchism. I remember saying something very similar as you were busy accusing me or questioning me on things that weren't said.