He Was Not Speaking For Them

in #blog6 days ago

Because that statement he made earlier today made it sound like, you know, he was in touch with the other 10 individuals. He came out and said, you know, he thought that these people were no's, right? And then he came out and said, you know, that he like clarified on, I think it was Gateway Pundit's post, that he did not know definitively. He was not speaking for them.

FREEWRITE.png

But then moments later, you know, the same list that we both put out earlier, I got it from you, was accurate on his first statement that those were all hard no's. So we have an update here. We don't know if this is really talking about no's too much anymore.

Speaker Johnson just came out and said he had the vote. This comes after he met with Massey, Burchett, and Victoria Sparks on the floor. So we're actually making progress here at 154 in the morning here at the U.S. Capitol.

I fucking called it that Massey would be one of the ones who fucking turned. I mean, Massey, we expected Massey to actually vote yes on the rule, right? So this isn't really, it's not surprising that Massey would vote yes. Victoria Sparks finally, I guess, decided she wanted to go home.

And so she was going to stop the stupid bullshit game about, yeah, I'm not voting for a man, but I'll vote by the bill. You know, so that was coming at some point. She got just absolutely leveled on this platform for that.

Well, that voting. It was Massey. It was Massey, Johnson and who? Burchett and Massey, Burchett, and who? Who's the other one? Sparks.

And I keep calling it Sharpe. That's probably a better name. Sparks.

Oh my God. Nick, will it go to conference committee after this? Has the House proposed amendments again to the bill? No, they are not changing it. They've been very clear about that.