You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Blurt RFC-001: Steemit, inc Stake

in #blurt4 years ago

Excluding anyone would be a huge mistake.
The project started with that as the premise and to take a u-turn now would be really bad.
You guys knew all about this being a potential benefit or problem from the beginning.
So whats changed?
Nothing everything is still the same.
I am sure the hope was that JS would open his arms out to the project and would take you to the moon and since he hasn't responded in either a positive or negative way.
People's balls are dropping and fearing the worse.
Have faith in your project and stick to your original vision else shut up shop now.
As you will be no different to hive.
Also if your taking away steemit stake you would have to take away all ninja mined stakes as thats the basis of your dilemma else it's just pointless.
In Blurt we believe 👊

Sort:  

Ah, let me be very clear:

We are only talking about ninja mined stake and stinc controlled accounts, no individuals.

Anyhow, this is exactly what I wanted-- feedback with context and thought.

Thank you.

Differences from Hive, even if we exclude steemit, inc:

  • No downvotes
  • New social graph
  • Inclusion of all individuals with normally earned stake (non-ninja mined)
  • New blockchain with no content
  • Different dev team with a different trajectory

How are we the same as hive?

Well, in our experience so far, Hive favors a collaborative approach to software and community development, and so do we.

Blurt loves its brothers, including steem.

Blurt might not love stinc-- we are collecting comments on that now.

Thank you.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.13
JST 0.032
BTC 60913.71
ETH 2919.21
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.71