You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Coniferous Trees: Practicing Early Spring Pruning Techniques [Bonsai]
That was a very nice glowing comment! Anything I can do better?
I think I tend to have content overflow in my descriptive writing sometimes, but most of my friends say they appreciate reading more my voice, authenticity, and effectiveness of my teaching.
Again thank you for reading and sharing! Are you normally interested in horticultural topics? What are your general interests in authors you follow?
Welcome for the comment, anon!~ ^^
Realistically this is a quality post on Steemit. But this post qua (in capacity of) of a manual would still do quite great; probably more bullet points and less text. And of course this post qua manual would be a very addition to such. So realistically, no (it would be minor, so so minor, nitpicks; most of that is really accents of which is not your fault I possess a different accent to yers).
And sometimes content overflow can be a net (or just a) positive. As long as the content matters to the topic at hand and the respect it deserves. As such, personally I, which we all share this I, think that even if this post suffered from "content overflow" at all, it hadn’t affect the reading of the post.
Welcome again for the upvote and resteem. I am not, but learning something everyday can be useful somewhere else. Even if it is a completely different field to the subject you read from (like reading science and making Science-Fiction(-n-Fantasy); albeit this analogy is semi-faulty as those fields do rely on each otheer and osciliate on their reciprocation depending on the years). With such, when I am on Steemit, I tend to look for these type of content: music (eclectic here), Fiction (general fiction), art and Science. Everywhere outside of Steemit: the Humanities (entire field from Philosophy to Art to Music), languages, politics and military in conjunction with Science. Might want calling me a Rennaissance person before I close off this comment ;^