You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit: Showing Why We Need To Get Rid Of Private Companies
Tesla Model S or the iPhone are good examples of a profound idea pushed hard by a single person.
The committees made fun of them (Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, auto manufacturers...)
Posted using Partiko Android
I don't know how else to phrase it, maybe: what stopped a committee or board from creating either of those things? Or why did it require "a single person"? Because other committees "made fun of them" isn't why those ideas required a single person VS a committee or why a committee isn't capable of bringing those products to market. I don't think you understood what exactly I asked and I don't know how to make it clearer.
Posted using Partiko Android
Committees go for the lowest common denominator. That's the opposite of interesting ideas.
Posted using Partiko Android
So the reasoning is "because committees go for the lowest common denominator, ergo they literally go for the opposite of interesting ideas".
So why does a committee go for the lowest common denominator? Is that your observation? Is that a consequence of any committee?
Posted using Partiko Android