You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Peer Review of Cardano's Ouroboros
Very good information. I'm sort of disappointed with how Dan jumps from project to project and talks dirt about other projects. Charles never does that (as far as i know).
It would however be very interesting to to see Dan and Charles go on the record and discuss this more on the tech side.
Bitshares, eth, etc, cardano... seems like you need to fact check.
Haters gonna hate. You keep up the good work.
I like boobs
@dan You are doing valuable work no matter what OS "project" you are working on.
In the OS space there is only one team and one project that benefits the whole Universe. Sorry to see people who are asleep to that and only focused on their little sliver of OS.
What we are collectively developing is nothing less than a universe - the Blockchain Universe. Bitshares, Steem and EOS are planets in that universe at specific stages of development. Everything has value because they demonstrate varieties of possibilities for future creations. (from my post ... Philosophy of the OS Universe - by a Blockchain Social Scientist)
Naw. He needs to downvote facts. And for the record, the risk to reward ratio for me saying this is definitely not in my favor considering past experience.
The facts are unacceptable, but this risk may be a big step to win. @fuzzyvest
You kicked him out Bitshares. Vitalik et al basically kicked him out of ETH because he didn’t want them to do an ICO the way they did it. ETC is political hot potato, so he found funding and is happy running IOHK with many PhDs which you are not.
I don't see nothing wrong with Dan taking on new projects. He's just way too good at designing new systems to be just maintaining one project.
I've heard Jordan Peterson in some video say once that liberal people tend to start companies and conservative people tend to run them. Or something like that. Either way it makes sense to me that some people are just way better at creating new things than maintaining them.
Btw Charles jumps around also, maybe even more.
Right. The different personality types need each other. The high in Openness types are required to create, think up, and launch crazy, disruptive ideas/businesses. But they are not the types to RUN the company once established. This is where the high in Conscientiousness types are needed. Their Orderliness and Industriousness (along with a usually lower openness) make them perfect for saying "OK enough of this crazy brainstorming. Let's get this done, effective, efficient and delivered"
There is IMMENSE value in understanding this. It appears to me Dan understood this around the time he left BitShares. He went from CEO of a company to a CTO and he left once his main added value was delivered.
This is how the world will gain most value from Dan, IMO. We won't benefit from Dan attending business meetings, doing taxes, working on a marketing campaign, etc. We benefit from this guy thinking and building incredible DACs/DAOs and DApps.
great insight
absolutely correct
most have no idea of how important this focus will be
dan make things happen, and manifests - thanks @dan
That is a really good point, @cob. Very well said. This comment nicely pads out the context Ned "colored" in.
The world is not split between open minded liberals and industrious conservatives, that's a blatantly oversimplified dualist fairytale but of course Jordan Peterson would say something like that.
The greats such as Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg can do both.
Dan is handicapped.
I'm the same. I invent and I'm terrible at maintaining. Many skill sets needed to make the (crypto) world go round.
That's true but I would consider all of crypto to be in a creation phase until 2020.
Maybe he just likes the founder coins.
No question, it's not about judgement in that respect and I hate that sort of judgement.
Dan is the only person I have seen consistently offer his technical views on so many projects.
I don't interpret it as dirt, but as a critical review from his experience. Very valuable critique, personally I find it a good sign he jumps from project to project as his value is in being at the frontier. Once a project is running, it's hard to change so there is no real choice here.
I think you will find charles has quite the potty mouth. check his tweets when asked questions about Dpos origins.
BTW Charles has now been involved in BTS - ETH- ETC and now ADA. see a pattern here?