then ask questions... comments on this "law of the century"
for me, they (the western system) as whole : sacrificed the ukies
again my opinon before their psyops beyond "full of themselves for some in moscow", they are russians...
my fundamental opinion, i agree on the eastern part, the so called being converted to the west
and believing that the same who did that to the ukies and russians, ... the worst they would understand what is a "sovereign assets" and why it was flagged specialy in INTER NATIONS "cvilized" rules of conduct...
as it would "legimitize" them... they may not, i don't know.
the bet... if they recognize they will be trying to regain credibility... and they may succeed
if they don't so stupid, they do a step more, but that will be counter or like the first amplified with again mass propaganda, and the suppression of any other opinions.
impossible they clearer when their system legitimize childrape and medical experimentation at beast on even pregnant women...
having "hopes" with those... waoo...
resaid : let's say a nation adopt all the PRC structuring... everything and declared on china (covert overt what ever), there wouldn't be hope because they have the same structure...
again resaid : not because the western countries have same apparent structure, court, parlement executive, that they are the same (the individual components)... formalism vs pragmatism
not what it says it does, but what he does, only. accounting on "hard facts", not on "said" :).
why klaus schwab, michael flynn, ritter, all inciste none stop on the rule of law, legality, never legitimacy, yes the youtubers do, but next topic then... grasshoping... illusions.
deep question : can it work simply
and 2 why were those sovereign assets left behind ? again not much in the big russian scheme, question will the west damage (not end, i guess) their court further... idk.
again, they can cloak to their plebes or serfs, not mentionning, but the case proceed none the less, they can play many many many games, but the other, sovereign and giga ones watching, with their full teams, what will be the outcome...
how they stole the chinese company in NL... like that boom, gone. i don't like jak bo for his professional work, very probable, but his youtube he just pixels, boom again, gone. russians sovereign boom "gone" so called frozen, the so called "associate" of putin, boom gone, imagine if you had financial planned to rent your loaned acquired yacht... and so on.
the plandemic, omg. boom gone. impact white washed... the number of businesses who got hammered... unbelievable... madness the WEF - OOH capture.
don't forget all those economic damages for the extraction of the WEF - OOH members associate and contrators, at the end impact too the business... those giga debts... present, higher taxes, lower disposable income, the cost cover up, the morons staying, those who did protected by their crimes etc... ravage.
maybe central : you can't rule and manage a nation with beliefs. work or not. if you believe it works but it doesn't, it still doesn't. the plane can land, if it's your belief and it's false from a bug of design, it can't... you will discover the reality sooner or later...the power of the belief has 0 chance against the reality.
and i get paniked that russians fell in the same trap, a danger this western system, for the people it can occupy, exploit, harvest, rape, murder, send to war, jab, what ever... problem cover is very effective as so push by so many memes, narratives, movies, stories...
like in accounting, doesn't matter, what's there, audit... quite simple. like tatooes for girl, sound simple, finally almost a djhad... their psyop, in their corrals it's normal it works due to suppression and monopolization, but no reason to get sunk by it elsewhere !
there the job too to understand accouting and if the audit is credible... well done, good or bad. case enron. sometimes hard to proof, is accounting of enron fake, hmmm... yes, no... why? he said, of course they all say...
warfare... different, the many graves of ukies, a testament. "to the last". omg... wait for it : to conquer (weaken) (or to the ural and beyond) the largest wmd state in the world... belief don't create reality. and denying reality to preserve a belief... worshiping man-made. sound different, but said the same thing.
when the wording of the community building must even be imposed to make a concept exist, there, already well corraled.
if you want, this one i find funny, like being in a casino, playing with shit of load of chips on the tables, big operations, many players, one unified stake, and winning big, and discovery the casino is bankrupt :)
i smile, terror... those chips now, worth nothing...
and it's too late...
now you remember a few of the other giga teams who already left the building to other casino earlier... when you started to rule it :)
then how to put the return of the money of the chips from the city where the casino is... the people... the public treasure raided for the payback... a way... to not take the loss.
but if the other casinos are in the same city they may oppose or agree, it may have been setup...
yes, a structured casino bankruptcy as a fake to extract the chips value outside... a scam
yes... welcome to the far west... and wild.
again then the violence, some refuse this scam...
and why we need true sovereign, so one can hedge through VIOLENCE, as the state seek violence in its monopoly for some... if unified no more hedge, and as such the possibility real is necessary.
resuming the smo...
and my fears...
an inner facade, a narrative inside a country accepted, so dumb, not because you see the same narrative projected in another country taht it's not a reality behind it. the version positive of the same thing, negatively, a trap, a fake. "welcome to our casino" (already bankrupt).
if you lose maybe, big, they could climb back, bad luck for them, it's your day... worst for the casino...
more than the monetary aspect...
this bankrupted casino, steal your things while you play and win, swaped your horse to make you believe it's yours, they tell you lies about others things to manipulate you, dirt food to make you later sick, bad people... still "wecome to our casino" exactly like the proper casino next door...
the belief in your perception of narrative, not because you see in other that it's true too there... in a sense they "welcomed you as welcoming as the other casinos", yes, they want you in and are pleased :).
while you play in the bankrupted casino, the cashier boot, for your chips, looks the same, in both :).
so question why this casino exemple is uncontestable and not the same logics applied to another state ? membership to the OOH and crossed with membership for the individual actors to the WEF and others gathering?
resaid : if the casino association of a surface, is corrupt, we need a casino :)
undeniable the "casino" exemple is just a simplification specially when applied to the complexity of a large sovereign... none the less, the logics works on 1 micro circuit of a few transitiors, or billions... fractal nature of certain logics... or concepts.
in coraling, they will want to break the fractal nature of concept into dogmas applied only on specifics, and not extending the ubuiqity of concepts.... 1+1 in abstract the same as in concret e... one bigger drop, or two cars.
part of the nature of the scam of the WEF - OOH concept of "too big too fail". where credibilizing the judicial instiutions of the adversary is a dangerous game... already, and the merge, beyond retarded : treaon level.
casino exemple isn't the worst...
to have trust, you need understanding and the undesrtsanding must be based on the observation from the applied outcome of said understanding.
basics... all the cia of who i don't know "they will be only confused (so we get rich and rape kids)"
big basics hyper important...
"to have trust, you need understanding and the undesrtsanding must be based on the observation from the applied outcome of said understanding. "
little exemple : a cat you pass next in the street who doing something, if you know him or her, the outcome expected will be in line with your understanding of it.
a nice dog, that you pass before and is always kind and polite with you, and expected outcome from you understanding of your observation.
both create a trust.
logic.
same cat or dog that won't want one day to see you, you will understand it too
trust.
why both this cat and dog will be honest toward you, they won' front a narrative to deceive you, "yes, happy" and rulez, no you, and it will be clear.
unlike the casino bankcrupt welcoming you...
or the americans : "we believe in a1" (front)
reality (back stage) : detected, annihilate.