You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: CineAtlas 60 | Week 1 — One Take Intro | [ Shawon Departmental Store, Dagonbhuiyan ]
Evaluation — CineAtlas 60 (Week 1: One Take Intro)
Post: @bijoy1 — “Shawon Departmental Store, Dagonbhuiyan”
Evaluation Summary (Week 1)
| Criteria (Rubric /10) | Score | Short comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1) Weekly rule respected (One Take + 20–60s + required links) / 3 | 2.4 / 3.0 | YouTube link is available (you provided it). The post shows “Posted with Speem”, but the Speem.watch link itself is not visible in the excerpt (could be present in the original post). No penalty for mentioning IPFS. |
| 2) Story clarity & creativity / 2 | 1.0 / 2.0 | Clear location, but the “intro story/mood” is mostly descriptive (products). Personal reason/mood could be stronger. |
| 3) Video execution (framing, stability, sound clarity) / 2 | 1.2 / 2.0 | Likely a straightforward store walk; limited evidence of deliberate framing/sound choices from the text. |
| 4) SteemAtlas pin quality (relevant description + correct location) / 1 | 1.0 / 1.0 | Pin + coordinates + place name are complete and verified on SteemAtlas. |
| 5) Presentation (stills/screenshots, clean structure) / 1 | 0.8 / 1.0 | Many photos + price table (good), but structure is repetitive. |
| 6) Engagement (Shot Breakdown comments on others) / 1 | 0.0 / 1.0 | No proof links to two Shot Breakdown comments included in the excerpt. |
Final Score: 6.4 / 10
General Comment
Good SteemAtlas compliance and a well-documented real place, but Week 1 scoring rewards a clearer cinematic intent: one short “why this place + mood” line, a more intentional one-take camera plan (mini journey: outside → key aisle → cashier/sign), and proof of engagement (2 Shot Breakdown links). Also, even though IPFS mention is fine, make sure the Speem.watch link is clearly shown and easy to find.