Proper Foundation of Light and Prisms
Universities teach many erroneous models.
One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton.
It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on.
Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false.
I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters.
https://rumble.com/v5x4qrk-prism-experiments-and-observations.html
I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves.
2 prisms for $10
https://amazon.com/dp/B0CC1ZB1Z3?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
Harmonics of Light and Sound:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1799892941332472311
This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them.
The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff.
Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation
https://rumble.com/v21162a-dinshah-spectro-chrome-machine-tour-and-explanation-aetherforce.html
Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom:
https://rumble.com/v24ef7u-goethes-purple-ray-monochromatic-rays-of-shadow-pehr-sallstrom.html
Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom:
https://rumble.com/v24effm-color-and-physics-compatibility-of-goethe-verses-newton.html
Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory:
https://alkemix.art/p/archetypal-approach-to-color
Clay Taylor Color Theory:
https://artofclaytaylor.com/light-and-color-theory
Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments.
Laser and Mirror observation:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1788284452843692208
It's never the same light. Re-emission Example:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1688300520098910209
I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript.
Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions).
https://rumble.com/v4zl9i6-re-emission-visualization-extinction-shift-principle.html
The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point.
The incoming light is a different frame of reference.
All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself.
Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
http://extinctionshift.com/details03.htm
Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context.
https://rumble.com/v6qdwf4-dr.-edward-dowdye-extinction-shift-principle-slides.html
E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1706007563731673218?s=20
Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More:
http://extinctionshift.com/SignificantFindings.htm
71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min)
The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1766194798187475358
Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives:
https://rumble.com/vbs6cx-classic-physics-vs-relativity-history-examples-and-alternatives-jason-verbe.html
Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time
https://rumble.com/v4guh68-the-illusions-of-relativity-space-time-vs-real-time-by-jason-verbelli.html
The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links:
https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/the-rebirth-of-classic-physics-light-time-and-gravity-jason-verbelli
Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time.
(This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.)
"Too off the rails."
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1832848624822473187
"1 x 1 = 2" ....
"If you double the frequency of light... you get sound!" ...
-- Terrance Howard
Ummm.. Sorry mayne. Not just inaccurate... like totally backwards and inaccurate.
If you double the frequency of sound... over and over and over... until you double that hertz frequency 49 times to reach the terahertz range... THEN you'll reach a harmonic of light and a wavelength of color associated with that octave of the harmonic.
It's easy to find harmonic numbers.
The rules are simple. Just start with 1.
1 hertz.
Every time you double the number, you go up one octave within that note.
1
2
4
8
16 etc.
Those frequencies correlate with a C note.
Every time you triple the number, you bump up 1 note.
1 = C .. 3 = G.. 9 = D .. 27 = A .. 81 = E .. 243 = B .. 729 = F note
Double down, triple across.
Now just keep doubling up the octaves until you reach the terahertz range of visible light.
Then you find the wavelength associated with that frequency.
c = λf
Find the wavelength λ by using λ= c/f
Divide the long numbers to get the nanometer wavelength of color... look up the html color code best associated with that wavelength.
Rife Frequency Technology deals with harmonics and pinpointing diseases and shattering them like a wine glass using specific radio waves pulsed at given harmonic rates and in chords, etc.
Sonochemistry is a branch of science dealing with vibration and molecular stimulus to facilitate chemical reactions.
A man named Johann Goethe refined Newton's color spectrum 125 years after Newton's death.
Goethe discovered a shadow for each newtonian color.
So I took the natural harmonic frequencies... bumped them up to the visible light range... got the wavelengths associated with those.... then flipped them negative to get the Goethe spectrum.
But the colors in the Goethe spectrum don't have wavelengths unto themselves like Magenta, Yellow or Cyan.
How can color not have a wavelength?
The colors in the Johann Goethe Spectrum are the SHADOWS of the Newtonian Spectrum.
I have a theory on that regarding negative space or the brain filling in what is not there. And the brain interprets the gaps as color sometimes.
When white light hits the surface of a red lady bug... The white light is absorbed by the electrons making up the red elytra. The electrons making up the elytra re-emit every color BUT red into the eye.
The brain fills in what is not there and we interpret that as color for that scenario.
We interpret the difference of what is there verses what is not.
And contrast to that... if we observe a coherent light from a laser or monochromatic light from an LED... the brain doesn't need to fill in any gaps because the eye sees the only thing that is there in relation to everything that is not.
A red coherent light will be interpreted by the brain, not as everything but red... but Only red.
So the Newtonian frequency and wavelength of color (RGB) associated with a harmonic of sound bumped up to the terahertz equivalent can be expressed in actual wavelengths.
But the Goethe spectrum (CMY) must be expressed in hex code equivalents because there is no wavelength for the Goethe spectrum persay.
It's the shadow OF the newtonian spectrum. Not wavelengths unto themselves.
Yellow is the shadow of Blue
Cyan is the shadow of Red
Magenta is the shadow of Green
In my model, gravity propagates just like light.
A photon is an energy packet, not a particle.
The packet is produced from single electrons dropping energy levels within 3 dimensions. The absorption of that photon packet and subsequent re-emission of a secondary packet produces the effect of illumination.
A graviton is an energy packet, not a particle.
The packet is initially produced from electron pairs dropping energy levels from a 2D coherent state, back to a 3D incoherent state. The absorption of that graviton packet and subsequent re-emission of a secondary packet produces the effect of gravitation.
There is a Newtonian Spectrum and a Goetheanian spectrum to both light and gravity. When they merge, it produces a full spectrum. The same rules for optics apply to gravitation, but with slightly tweaked equations. I provide those equations in detail in my book series titled Galilean Variance.
Demonstrating Johann Goethe Colored Shadows:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1899888694057984032?s=20
By having a proper understanding of Light... we can apply those fundamentals to magnetism and even gravity. Since light, magnetism and gravity are all ultimately produced by electrons... we can have a better foundation to understand how they can work together. Or use the fundamentals of one to apply in another area.
All of this is included in my books. Combining the work of some of the greatest minds you ever heard of... with the greatest minds you've never heard of.
Magnetic Waveforms Thread:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1879732876956299512
Visual Context for Magnetic Sinewaves:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1884329344488853792
Visual Context for Magnetic Waveforms generating electricity:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1884674312038473937
Applying magnetic waveforms to a generator (SEG):
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1881774717289513217
Magnetic Waveforms Polarity Flip Context:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1885038486350422098
The work of Jon DePew
https://magneticspectrum.com
Ignored Magnetic Experiments of Jon Depew:
https://x.com/TheRealVerbz/status/1817975883694752001
I think the work of Johann Goethe will give a lot of insight here.
This article describes a new color named Olo, discovered at UC Berkeley in a small lab.
You sit in a chair and scoot close to the apparatus and bite down on a plate to keep your head extra still.
They fire a laser beam through lenses which ends up shooting directly into one of your eyes. Charging about 100 cones in the eye. The result is the color Olo.
Yellow is the shadow of blue.
Cyan is the shadow of red.
Magenta is the shadow of green.
Magenta doesn't exist as a wavelength but rather can be expressed as a Hex color code equivalent.
LASERs do not exist in nature.
Coherent, isolated and collimated light does not exist in nature. So if they are using a bunch of lenses to warp the wavelength of their laser apparatus through the re-emission of secondary packets... and the cones are absorbing and re-emitting the tertiary packets... then the brain will interpret the negative or shadow of the stimulus. And the difference between the normal color in one eye versus the stimulus and shadow in the other eye.
So the "beautiful ultra intense teal" might be the shadow of whatever wavelength(s) they are manipulating from the source and then re-emitted through the lenses. Plus the difference between that and the other eye.
The color Olo might not exist as a wavelength unto itself, like magenta, but could potentially be expressed as a Hex color code equivalent.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2025/04/olo-color-berkeley-teal/682557/
Might not exist even as a Hex color code equivalent unto itself either. Might need to have a stereoscopic image and separate each eye, but like a Magic Eye book where you focus on the background to bring the images together... it might behave in a similar fashion but for the interference of color.
Stay tuned for the next articles dealing with the velocity of light itself... and from different frames of reference. Invalidating Doppler Shift and providing a different mechanism for redshift.
This will be a journey. This information isn't for everyone. It's the most radical departure from Relativity, Quantum Theory and Aether Theory you will ever encounter. (Bold claims... let's see if it holds.)
No space-time
No 4th dimension
No aether
No particle-wave duality
No literal time dilation
No relativistic mass
No light speed limit
We will be returning to reason. Under a variable model for the velocity of light. Yielding the same predictions and solutions with equal accuracy if not more than Lorentz invariance (relativity).
This information tends to piss people off... It's gotten me in a lot of trouble over the course of 20 years. I stand alone in many of my views.
These are original thoughts and quite heretical compared to the well established dogma people learn in universities and text books today.
Thank you for your time and interest.
Jason Verbelli
Founder of Galilean Variance
https://galileanvariance.com