RE: What is Communist Anarchism? Ch27!
If you are interested in the main problems of this text. They are in the romantic position of anarchists. That is to take place on governors. When they are simply deprived of power and made citizens. They forget at the same time. The governor is a man. In his position and power, he committed crimes. For example, for robbing people. Assignment of added value. He, like any criminal, cannot be made a mere citizen. You will have to judge and punish.
Or the socialization of the means of production. The anarchist Makhno abandoned this practice. The means of production must belong to the people who work for them. For example. I have land on this land I grow vegetables and some fruits. A revolution is taking place. Why take away from me the land that I cultivate without attracting hired labor? I work the land with my own hands. Although with the involvement of technology. You can even shoot me. Only no one else will work the land. It will not harvest and as a result will not feed people. At the same time, I'm not a turner. Even if you give me a lathe. The most modern CNC machine. What am I going to do with it? Just not trained to produce such screws. Although I have a hobby for remodeling furniture and use screws. It is more logical to transfer the means of production to the people who work for them. They know how to manage them. They benefit society.
The result? The turner produces screws. I'm releasing potatoes. I give potatoes to the turner, another gives sugar, etc. The turner gives us the screws. As a result, the turner and his family are full. I have the items I need for my life and hobbies.
Да, это возможно, мы просто должны отказаться от валюты банкиров и работать с собственной валютой, если мы хотим сохранить капитализм, или мы бросаем большинство бухгалтеров и всех юристов и политиков в торговые школы, чтобы они тоже могли стать продуктивными.
И тогда мы просто позволяем людям потреблять то, что им нужно, чтобы быть счастливыми в обмен на несколько продуктивных часов работы.
Кропоткин говорит, что для поддержания уровня жизни каждого достаточно ~20 000 часов, я бы сейчас предположил, что благодаря автоматизации это будет меньше.
Дело не в том, что больше работы не найти, а в том, что новая шкала оплаты включает в себя досуг, который раньше приносился в жертву за более новую машину или более красивую квартиру.
Мы можем управлять этим миром лучше, чем то, что сейчас на нас давит.
Переведено с помощью www.DeepL.com/Translator (бесплатная версия)
Banks should be banned. There should only be a state-owned bank. You probably haven't heard the theory about negative loans. Let's say you need $ 100 for personal needs. Take this consumer loan. They are obliged to return $ 80 or $ 60 to the state bank, depending on their work experience.
In other words, not one private bank can do this. In the USSR, there was such a practice. It raised the standard of living of ordinary citizens. As a result, there was also an economic benefit.
Now with regard to leisure. Kropotkin was still a theorist. In the USSR, there was a practice. Usually speaking about leisure, everyone mentions 2 professions of a musician and an artist.
More often, a hobby that is chosen by people who are much more mundane.
For example, I like to grow fruits and vegetables. I have a hobby of making furniture. When you pick up a spoiled unnecessary thing. Then you finish the work and it's better than a new thing, beautiful. You feel like a creator. Or here is growing vegetables. When a small sprout breaks through the soil. You water it. Then you collect the results of your work.
In addition, we have hobbies in the form of fishing, collecting mushrooms. In other words, if a person has free time. He won't just lie there and spit at the ceiling. He'll do something interesting. This case will benefit the society.
Will there be those who don't want to do anything? Of course! That's just the USSR showed. Such people will not be respected. They won't find friends. They won't start a family. Motivation by public approval. Or the motivation of public censure. This, believe me, is not always weaker than the motivation to make money.
The result is a strange thing. Conditionally -20,000 hours of mandatory work.
And maybe 200,000 hours of doing what you love. Hobbies can also be useful.
It is even found in some of the poems of the time. The translator will not be able to translate the verses. So I'll just pass on their contents.
I wish winter would come sooner. The reservoir will be covered with ice. I'll do some ice fishing. I'll give the fish to my friends and neighbors. I don't need it. I just like fishing.
In other words, a person wants to do a favorite hobby. The result of the work of his hobby is not very important to him. The process is important to him. He has no problems with money. Therefore, the question of food is not worth it. At the same time, it benefits society by distributing the catch (fish) to friends and neighbors.
Give me more time. Give free accessories and many materials. Why would I sell the restored furniture? Moreover, I do not need so much furniture in my house and my city apartment. Therefore, under such conditions, I will simply start distributing it to friends and neighbors. I'll be morally pleased to know. The satisfaction that they use beautiful and high-quality things and know that I created them with my own hands.
The creator's pride in his work. The result? 20 hours a week of mandatory work. And everything else is a hobby. That's just leisure will also benefit society.
Да, это именно то, что предсказывает Bellamy.
What do you think about the practice of negative loans in the USSR? The meaning of the loan? You take 100 coins, give back 60-80 coins? Or do you think it is necessary to initially abandon any currency? Do not have a transition period.