Ganymede Hypothesis, Logic and Images

gungasnake (49)in #cosmology • 9 months ago (edited)

Logic of the Ganymede Hypothesis

Human origins and solar system origins have to be studied together, i.e. there is no making sense of the one or the other separately.
The most major pieces of evidence involved are planetary axis tilts, and the relative eye sizes of creatures liviing on the planets in question.
Older Wiki pages and likely most astronomy books give the tilts of Jupiter and Venus as 3.13 and 177.3. Most pople would just glance at that and never give it any thought; what you had to realize was that you needed to view tilt as the angle distance from a perpendicular to the plane of the system. Viewed that way, Jupiter and Venus have the exact same tilt to within less than half a degree and newer Wiki pages give the tilt of Venus as 2.64 degrees.
That, of course, brings up the subject of Immanuel Velikovsky, who claimed that Venus amounted to material that had been ejected from Jupiter [as a means of relieving electrical stress]. The thing about axis tilts likely would not shock or surprise him; everybody else is totally snaffed by it. Nobody should believe in extreme coincidences and there is no way to start with either standard theories or David Talbott’s version of a Saturn theory and see Jupiter and Venus having the same tilt as anything other than an extreme coincidence.
Velikovsky also predicted the conditions that would be found on Venus, particularly the extreme surface temperatures and that was in 1950 when science books were telling us that conditions on Venus were almost certainly similar to those on Earth.
But the story about axis tilts gets better starting from all of that. Uranus and Pluto, two of the three bodies in in the outer reach of our system, have oddball tilts and the best idea seems to be just to ignore them; they likely have some kind of separate little stories of their own.
But the other major bodies divide into two distinct groups:
The sun, Jupiter, Venus, and Mercury all have tilts less than ten degrees, which is more or less what you’d expect to find.
But Saturn, Neptune, Mars, and Earth have tilts ranging from around 23 to around 28 degrees. That suggests that those bodies had been a separate system early on, and had been captured as a group, probably recently.
The idea is this: those bodies, still in a linear alignment leftover from the formation of the system as a Herbig/Haro string, flew into the Sun/Jupiter system at a roughly 26-degree angle (to the center line of the original system) and, as the individual bodies were captured and began to orbit as they do now, ordinary gyroscopic force caused them to retain that roughly 26-degree angle to perpendicular of approach in the form of axis tilts.
We tend to think of solar systems as orbital systems governed by gravity since our own system behaves like that... But late antediluvian artwork clearly shows a linear alignment of planets, governed by electromagnetic forces and not gravity.
That would be the little Egyptian Shen clasp showing Mars inside Neptune inside Saturn, and the Babylonian Shamash glyph, showing a crescent of light on the face of Saturn and then Neptune and Mars. The artists were seeing something like this: ![image.png]()
Gravity is by 40 orders of magnitude the weakest force in nature. Asking gravity to form up a solar system from swirling dust or to hold a spiral galaxy together is like asking the littlest kid in the school to do the powerlifting event. What actually creates solar systems are cosmic Birkeland currents createed by plasma charge separations in space and the electromagnetic pinches where the current pairs of such a thing cross each other. Those pinches DO have the power to aglommerate the plasma of space into stars.
Space is a plasma environment and not a vacuum. There are charge separations across vast regions of space and, because of those charge separations, we see Birkeland currents arcing across huge regions. Those are twisted pairs of currents which look like DNA/RNA strings.
Where those current pair cross each other, there is electrical short circuiting and what are called Z-pinches, and those electromagnetic pinches DO have the power to agglomerate plasma into much more solid objects, proto-stars and other cosmic objects. Birkeland currrents with stars or protostars showing at their pinch points are called Herbig/Haro objects. HH objects are not gaseous "jets" as some sources claim; a gas jet would dissipate in seconds in the near vacuum of space.
Typical Herbig/Haro string, You can see the round stars forming along the length of the string wherre the electromagnetic pinch points occur:
Our own system originally looked quite a lot like that. That is to say, the Saturnian group (the bodies that later acquired the roughly 26-degree axis tilts) on one side, then a bunch of open space, followed by the Jovian group, particularly Ganymede, and then our present sun on the far end. The normal situation in our galaxy is for gas giant planets and dwarf stars aligned with a main sequence star like our sun to be up closere to the main star than Jupiter or Saturn are now, which is why you read about "hot Jupiters". Such an arrangement of our own system would, of course, turn Ganymede into a fresh water ocean world instead of the frozen wasteland it is now.
The Logic of the Diagram
The entire system prior to the transfer event was, as is usual for Herbig/Haro strings, on a fairly straight line. Earth or Ganymede being off that center line or Earth approaching on a spiral path would prrevent the transfer of aquatic mammals including humans.
Likewise, for whatever reason, the two largest rocky bodies in their respective systems had to be on the outermost positions of the systems for the transfer to take place. The transfer could not have taken place through one of the other Galillean moons...
Likewise having the sun between the two dwarf star systems would (obviously) prevent any kind of transfer. The sun had to be on one side.
The sun was either behind Saturn or behind Jupiter, but logic rules out the idea of the sun being behind Saturn.
The oldest oral traditions describe the early period of Saturn being our dwarf -star sun as a very dark sort of a "Purple Dawn" in which the middle part of the light spectrum was simply not present. Troy McLachlan's diagram shows what that looked like:
You would expect the creatures of such a world to have huge dark-world eyes and, in fact, they pretty much all did..
That included pretty much all dinosaurs, all hominids, and leftover creatures from that age still walking or flying around, lemurs, tarsiers, owls...
Neanderthal eye sockets are very much larger than ours. Accurate reproductions such as those of Danny Vendramini show the Neanderthal to be a fabulously bug-eyed creature.
In those days, Jupiter's largest moon, Ganymede, had a bright side (facing Jupiter and the sun) and a dark side facing back towards the distant Saturnian system. The bright side must have looked something like this:
As the day of that first near approach of the Saturnian system and the transfer of humans to Earth drew near, the view from the back side of Ganymede probably looked more like this:
The Eemian climate optimum, said to be warmer than the Holocene, coincides roughly with at least some estimates of the arrivel of modern humans in Austgralia and, again, the Ganymede Hypothesis is compatible with an Out of Australia theory of human origins. The Eemian optimum would most likely have produced a golden age similar to the Classical Greco-Roman golden age of the Holocene in which Satuurn shed golden light for a period of time most likely measured in thousands of years. People on that back side of Ganymede thus would have seen a ring of golden light behind the blue of the Pacific side of Earth, the sub-Saturn point on Earth still being Pico island, which is still the highest point of land in the Atlantic ocean.
Originally the entire system including both dwarf-star subsystems had been moving in the direction from the Saturnian subsystem towards the Jupiter/sun subsystem. Apparently, Jupiter was never really far enough away from the sun to prevent it being captured and the capture itself slowed the combined sun/Jupiter system enough for the Saturnian group to eventually catch up to it.
When that first near approach occurred ,an electrical water bridge formed between Earth and Ganymede and aquatic mammals including humans transferred to Earth. The first humansd on Earth were culturally sophisticated but not technologically sophisticated. High Tech to them was an atlatl, and there is no way to think they had space craft.
After the transfer event, the Saturnian system recoiled and bounced back due to electromagnetic repulsion, but it did not bounce back on the same straight line on which it had approached. As is the case with train wrecks in which cars have no way to keep moving forward and move outwards, the entire Saturnian system was moved off the center line of the entire system and at a roughly 26-degree angle to it so that when after a few tens of thousands of years, the Saturnian bodies reversed and again began moving towards the sun/Jupiter system and finally flew into it, the rough 26-degree angles to that original center line of the system (that was also the direction of the sun's axis) was preserved by ordinary gyroscopic force as the roughly 26-degree axiis tilts that we still observe. That is, the angle of approach was preseerved in the form of axis tilts. The time involved in all of that was likely a few tens of thousands of years. By that time Venus had come into existence and is shown off to one side of Jupiter:
This second approach was on a spiral path due to the offset. The large Saturnian bodies, Saturn and Neptune, flew around Jupiter while Earth and Mars were caught up in the Jupiter/Venus alignment. Earth, Mars, and Venus remained near the sun while the large bodies all ultimately threw themselves into the outer part of the system.