You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Incentive trees and what we can learn from Bitconnect
if you did your research properly and weren't trying to recruit people to your scam you would see that there are 3 listed with bitconnect in there name
bitconnect the cryptocurrency waas registered here by Ken FITZSIMMONS,
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10278342/officers
the one you listed has multiple people none being ken FITZSIMMONS
the exchange is the central point of failure which deals with over 90% of volume when case are put against will be seized and owners will be gone with what they can pull in an exit
it is conclusively proven to be a scam and you supporting are a scammer
get your facts straight before talking shit
You have collected your daily Power Up! This post received an upvote worth of 0.86$.
Learn how to Power Up Smart here!
@isacoin
I'm not offering any referral link am I? So I'm neutral but you are clearly anti. What is in it for you to care so much about this? I don't know who made Bitcoin either and at any moment if I'm a holder the creator could dump a bunch of Bitcoins. I don't actually hold Bitcoin but I also don't go to around making it my mission to prove Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme or call it a scam.
Here are some facts: Something cannot be defined as a scam as long as people are getting paid. In Bitcoin people get paid, in Steemit people get paid, and in Bitconnect people get paid. None of them are scams. This means according to the dictionary definition of scam, to be a scam requires fraud. Show fraud and you reveal the scam.
Are they Ponzi schemes? That is a different question but it doesn't matter to me as long as people are still getting paid. When people are not getting paid or when the thing stops working then it's a scam. This is from a very neutral point of view that I make these definitions. You also claimed "tax evasion" but provided no evidence of this.
Your point about "Ken FITZSIMMONS" really has nothing to do with anything. It was you who claimed Bitconnect was going to be shut down by the UK and I refuted that with the facts. It's not going to be shut down by the UK government. This is a separate question as to whether or not it is a Ponzi scheme which honestly I don't know or really care. As far as whether it is a scam, it does not meet the definition by any standard because people are getting their money back.
Scams do not give people their money back and scams don't actually make people profit. So if that is a scam I don't mind that kind of scam as long as it keeps paying out. When it stops paying out is when I join your side on that debate but not before.
References
who made bitcoin is irrelevant isn't a company and doesn't ask for money
bitcoin is in no way a ponzi scheme has much utility is not just a token like 100's of thousands of other crypto
not facts people can and do get paid by scams before they pull an exit
in bitcoin coins are created due to POW nobody is asking for money
Evidence for
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10278342
first tax filing was due in July 2017 and one week before bitconnect moved operation to Indonesia
bitconnect is a fraud due to fact that holding bitcoin would yield more and unless they hold reserves to match market cap wouldn't be able to pay if everybody wanted to withdraw
by the time it stops paying out will be too late will have exited
Yeah and Jamie Dimon says the same about Bitcoin. This is why I say:
All of it is gambling. You might prefer to gamble on Bitcoin as your own preference but lets not pretend like Bitcoin price cannot be manipulated, or like you know the motives for the creation of Bitcoin. Also POW does ask for money, how do you mine without paying money ? So you lock up your money in mining equipment which breaks after 6 months, and how do I know? I've got experience.
If the token goes to zero then all your equipment you are stuck with. Bag holder in equipment is no different than if you hold a useless mining contract, or anything else. It's not a scam, it's called you gambled and you didn't win. Profits are not guaranteed in Bitconnect, or Bitcoin, or any crypto, If you choose to mine no one is guaranteed to buy the token, and any little thing can go wrong to crash the price.
Jamie Dimons statements are not based on facts and bitconnect is nothing like bitcoin has no economic principles security or utility
POW isn't asking for money its economic cost to secure network rewarded by minting
any market can be manipulated bitconnect controls the exchange that handles 90% of volume takes payment in an asset more valuable than what it pays which makes it much easier and cheaper to manipulate
size of bitcoin network and growth shows no chance of going of going to zero bitcoin has economic principles and utility bitconnect does not
no little thing can "crash" price now examples being everything bitcoin has survived isnt going anywhere