RE: ICO Review - Lamden [Lamden.io]
Hey this is Stuart from Lamden here (I'll post a PasteBin with my Keybase to verify)
Few things wrong with this account.
You assume that I only did two projects as part of my tenure at the agency I built from scratch. Ignoring the fact that there is literally a portfolio document with more examples on the site (http://logiclabsltd.com/portfolio.pdf), in the agency world, you sign a lot of work under NDA so that the client can act like they produced the work themselves. This is commonplace, and as such, a lot of the work I did I can't publically showcase.
You seem to make another assumption that because I worked with startups and small businesses, which taught me to launch products, that that must have mean I have no programming experience whatsoever in the blockchain space. In fact, a lot of programmers work on other projects in their spare time.
Let's talk credentials. I run the largest machine learning group dedicated to financial applications on FB: https://www.facebook.com/groups/321928341517208/
I go through blockchain concepts step by step in code in real time here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpk6krHUlmcf0FWnFFHFpZQ/videos. If you doubt our abilities, check this out.
Also, included in that video are demonstrations of the software working now. Our Github is here: https://github.com/lamden
===
Proof of identity: https://pastebin.com/0SsRDUgG
Public keybase: https://keybase.io/stustu
Thanks for the reply, I will go through the information you have added.
As I mentioned in my post, I am not saying that Lamden is destined to fail or you are not capable. What I am saying is there are so many ICOs taking place that we generally do not have the time to dig too deep into it and we look at the surface information provided.
The points I have above I still think are valid for someone who was thinking of investing and started doing a little digging.