Well, I have read both sides of the story and what is missing on both sides is integrity.

Goldseek is clearly seeking revenge - their attacks are just for that sake without solid arguments.

But Harrison has also lied to investors and banned from the communication channels those who have raised concerns about his mistakes - instead of addressing them. He had to fundamentally rethink the whole value model.

I get that you need to defend yourself because Goldseek also attacked your reputation in their "article". But Daniel can defend himself and he should have been the one to release those e-mails, not you. My 2 cents.