Hey, @goldseek, thanks for the reply! I like how you are giving me an example to follow instead of just feedback. That’s great, I really do learn better by extrapolating then just being given information.

Obviously I need to use more capital letters, I get that now. It really does seal in the flavor of righteous indignation which is a great frame to put around the message so any anxiety over the exposure would be seen as anger at being wrongly accused. Good stuff, I’ve noted it down.

Just wanted cover your technique in a few places so that I can use it effectively later..

you proceeded to reply in a very sleazy way.

So start with an insult, that transfers you from defense to offense, right?

I REFUSE TO SPEAK PRIVATELY TO YOU

This is good, it covers the idea that you can’t be hiding anything since you are SO ethical and moral that you can't even talk to him without being overwhelmed by disgust.

group of COiN artists!

A little awkward but I get what you are doing here. Kind of a Johnnie Cochran “glove don’t fit” thing; a slogan that catches in the mind.

I do have some questions as well. It’s about contradictions. I think I may worry too much about them in my writing. For instance this...

Since *** Daniel Mark Harrison *** decided to write this under his many alias accounts, or use someone to post for him, it does not matter.

Daniel Harrison response above is clear.

You speak of ethics yet PARTIAL e-mails appears, that are private communications between Daniel Harrison and the host of the radio show.

These confidential emails are being sliced up and posted? That is very "ethical".

Isn't there a risk that readers are going to notice that you have declared the post was written by Daniel Harrrison but then accuse the writer of using confidential communications between Daniel Harrison and GoldSeek? If he wrote the post then they are his emails to publish, right?

I observe that you are using contradictions in a more strategic way here.

Unfortunately the real emails that we need access to, which connects Daniel Harrison to others in scheming there way to lie and profit from people who fell for his lies.

Next, why do we have only part of these emails provided? Does not provide full context to the conversation and does not show how you manipulate others into doing things and enticing them with rewards and asking for marketing deals and proposals.

Btw, I have never seen these emails as I did not write them and never had any conversation ever with Daniel Harrison.

I like the confusion you create by saying there are more emails but you’ve never seen any of them including these. :) Also, the part about the “real emails” really has that Trump “fake news” feel to it which I think has been highly successful for him.

This one I’m really going to need your advice on.

GoldSeek never officially proposed ANY sort of deal for Monkey Capital. As part >of the marketing scam that we now understand, Daniel Harrison came onto the >show for free and gave away Coevals.

You are making a statement that is directly contradictory to the evidence presented in the article? I just don’t think I could get away with that. It’s just too blatant. Am I overthinking it?

Last one, I promise.

he lied to us and instead sold coins to make himself and his monkeys very rich.

Those who are interested in coming together in a class action against Daniel Mark Harrison for the Monkey Capital ICO scam, please contact me and you will be placed with a growing group of investors who are seeking compensation.

It ends the post on a strong note with scary “lawsuit” language but how do you keep it from losing some of the zing when you say that he made a bunch of people rich right beforehand?

Again, thanks for the help. I know what it’s like to have newbies leaning on you for help when you’re trying to get your day-to-day done but I really feel like I’m picking up a lot from you and I should be able to stand on my own soon. You’re the best!