The CryptoCurrency Tax Fairness Act

A lot of people across the US who use digital currency such as bitcoin for small purchases face a big problem : under current tax rules, any little transaction — like buying a cup of coffee — can be considered a capital gain, and trigger an obligation to the IRS (Internal Revenue Service).

It began on March 2014 while IRS announced that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are treated as property, which means gains from sale or exchange are taxed as capital gains rather than ordinary income.

IRS tax.jpg

This is in contrast to how foreign currencies are treated, which do enjoy an exemption. Say you buy 100 GBP for $ 130 because you’re spending the week in UK. Before you get to UK, the exchange rate of the Euro rises so that the 100 GBP you bought are now worth $ 140. When you buy a chocolate with your GBP, you experience a gain, but the tax code has a so called de minimis exemption for personal foreign currency transactions, so you don’t have to report this gain on your taxes. You’re good to go and no need to pay tax.

bitcoin tax.jpg

Such an exemption does not exist for non-currency property transactions. This means that every time you buy a cup of coffee, or an MP3 download, or anything else with bitcoin, it counts as a taxable event. If you’ve experience a gain because the price of Bitcoin has appreciated between the time you acquired the bitcoin and the time you used it, you have to report it to the IRS at the end of the year, no matter how small the gain. Obviously this creates a lot of friction and discourages the use of Bitcoin or any cryptocurrency as an everyday payment method.

bitcoin soar.jpg

The taxing of digital currencies has become a big issue because the price of digital currencies has soared so dramatically. Bitcoin, for instance, has soared from $ 1,000 at the start of 2017 to a recent high of $ 8,000 — meaning that anyone who has sold it or exchanged it or goods at retailers is on the hook to declare capital gains and pay the tax.

CryptoCurrency Tax Fairness Act

A solution may be on the way. A new proposal by US lawmakers in the form of CryptoCurrency Tax Fairness Act (CFTA) introduced in the House of Representatives. It propose for Congress to create de minimus exemption for transactions under $ 600. The purpose would be to remove the friction and encourage the development of this innovative technology and its use in payments.

CFTA.jpg

CFTA is currently being debated in the U.S. Congress. If it is passed, it would subject digital currency to a similar tax regime as what currently exists for foreign currency. It would also eliminate a disincentive for people to use bitcoin (and other digital assets) in day to day transactions.

Other Countries Regulation on Cryptocurrency

Most nations make their crypto users submit to one of three fundamental taxation categories: Income tax, Company tax or Capital gains tax.

Income tax, applies to all non-incorporated entities that receive Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies as income.

Company tax, applies to enterprise-grade operations that are large and deal, accordingly, with huge amounts of crypto. Think of a cloud-mining company like Genesis Mining, for example.

Capital gains tax, applies to traders who have invested in crypto speculatively with the express purpose of making gains. Most nations split capital gains taxes into short-term gains and long-term gains categories depending on various criteria.

bitcoin regulation.jpg

Now, let’s shift to specific national taxation approaches.

Canada: Per a 2013 interpretation letter, the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) declared cryptocurrencies are “commodities” under Canadian law—just like silver or natural gas.

This means here your crypto will either be taxed as business income or as a capital gain (or business loss and capital loss, respectively).

Mexico : The Mexican government has a liberalized, open-minded legal attitude toward Bitcoin. Domestic regulatory framework is not yet finalized, but the nation’s legislature is actively designing new measures.

UK : The British government repealed their VAT tax against Bitcoin in 2014. Now, most cryptocurrency transactions are exempt from VAT fees in the nation.

Moreover, the HM Treasury considers BTC and other cryptocurrencies to be “assets,” not legal currencies. This mandates such crypto be taxed either by an income tax or a capital gains depending on the circumstances (if you’re a trader, for example, you’ll pay capital gains).

Mining is hit with company income taxation here.

Germany : Like the UK, Germany doesn’t apply a VAT tax to cryptocurrencies.
If you’re a trader, you have free capital gains up to € 800. Once you breach this amount, you’ll need to pay a 25% flat-rate on your speculative gains.

If you’ve made gains from simply holding your crypto and never moving it, you won’t owe any taxes in Germany.

Like in Britain, large-scale mining operations are hit with company taxes here.

The Netherlands : Holland’s Finance Minister announced that the Dutch government would be considering Bitcoin and the like as “barter items” henceforth.

This classification was a liberal one, giving crypto users in the nation no need to license their activities or meet any sort of compliance regulations.

Accordingly, Dutch crypto users’ holdings are taxed according to these users’ respective basic income tax rates.

Switzerland : The Swiss have officially categorized Bitcoin as a “foreign currency.”
Capital gains taxes aren’t applied to the vast majority of individuals in Switzerland, either, so that’s another important dynamic to consider.

Italy : Zero taxation on cryptocurrencies as of Q3 2017.

Russia : Taxation laws as applied to individual users are unset for now. However, Russian president Vladimir Putin just instructed the Russian Duma to draft up a framework through which to regulate and tax large crypto mining operations in the nation.

China : In Q3 2017, China banned crypto exchanges and Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) indefinitely in domestic markets, leading many pundits to wonder if the Chinese Communist Party was on the verge of banning crypto ownership altogether.

The reasons for these bans ? Chinese regulators are concerned about clamping down on the possibilities of money laundering through crypto before the crypto space gets too big and too unmanageable.

These Chinese bans will likely not be permanent, but they will remain as Chinese administrators further workout a new tax framework.

Japan : Japan’s top regulatory watchdog considers Bitcoin to be a “commodity.” The nation’s government also ended the 8% “Consumption tax” that hitherto applied to crypto on July 1st, 2017.

Beyond that, Japanese crypto users contend with all of the normal taxation models: income tax, capital gains tax, and company tax.

South Korea : South Korean regulators are currently exploring a range of taxation options including 1) value-added taxation (VAT), 2) gift taxes, 3) income tax, and 4) capital gains tax.

Australia : The Australian government just ended the infamous “double tax” on crypto in Australia by exempting cryptocurrencies there from facing the goods-and-services tax (GST).

Israel : Israel’s top financial watchdog drafted up new rules at the beginning of 2017 that classified cryptocurrencies as “assets” that must fall under the purview of capital gains taxes in the nation.

Turkey : Cryptocurrencies are taxed just as any other regular financial instruments are here.

Brazil : Brazilian legislators have characterized crypto as an “asset,” not a currency.

Bitcoin house.jpg

Most Nations See Cryptocurrencies As Property

As you can see, then, the predominant international trend is to regulate cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin as if they were “property” and “assets.” Most nations have yet to come around to the idea of treat crypto like real currencies in a technical, legal sense.

So back to CryptoCurrency Tax Fairness Act, If CFTA were to get passed, many countries will adopt this revolutionary regulations. Cryptocurrency users would benefit greatly from it, in terms of feeling comfortable with making micro-purchases with their bitcoin. This will trigger many parties such retailers, online & offline shops accept cryptocurrency payment.

It’s not hard to see why this technology is exciting the world of payments. Traditionally we’ve had to rely on intermediaries like credit card operators (visa, mastercard,etc) or paypal to maintain a database of account balances. In cryptocurrency that database is maintained by thousands of nodes in an open network and constantly validated by the work of countless miners. Suddenly you have a new payment option. Since there is no intermediary, cryptocurrency works a lot like cash, but online.

Two decades ago, early Internet developers found themselves in a legal gray area. If old laws were strictly applied to them, they could be held responsible for the content that their users uploaded to their websites. In the 1990s, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The laws protected Internet companies from liability for what their users did. Without these laws, the Internet would probably still exist today, but it would be a very different, and likely less useful, tool.

Regulators should be looking at cryptocurrency in the same way. Cryptocurrency could become critical infrastructure that one day revolutionizes the online economy. Like the open Internet, support from government is key to fostering its growth. Fortunately, there are concrete steps that the U.S. government can take to ensure the country’s competitiveness in this booming sector.

milestone.jpg

So now let's wait the outcome of CFTA
If it is approved, then cryptocurrency would reach another milestone !

Sort:  

Helpful information :)

Hahaha. If you think it's bad now, just wait until the states get involved! Just look at what the states did to Amazon when they realized all of the uncollected state taxes that were going uncollected when people purchased online.

If you think the tax-code is going to get easier in relation to Cryptos, KEEP DREAMING.

Go to YouTube and look up Illinois Pension Crisis. More and more states are in the RED and are looking for any source of unrealized revenue. If you think you deserve tax relief because you use a funky new technology, think again.

A wonderful write up its going to be crazy this year for taxes and I do feel thats why most people are holding out because they are still not sure what to do. I feel once we roll into 2018 money will flood in as they have all year to figure out what to do then.

I basically cashed out, I'm so dreading tax season :( I also hope this bill gets passed I find it tedious I have to look back on some small things i purchased with crypto and track those sub 5$ payments.

The problem is the absence of laws.

The IRS can say that will treat BTC as Capital gain. But since their is no law, then their's no certainty that this will stay the same in the future.

Hence the confusion and uncertainty

"I feel once we roll into 2018 money will flood " me too

I wonder if the author realizes that the IRS actually did crypto holders a favor by classifying crypto curriences as assets versus as currency? I don’t believe it was entirely well thought out but the fact remains that paying capital gains amounts to a significantly lower tax rate than the income tax does for those of here who actually pay income taxes. Please note I said pay income taxes not file a return. Why do you think people such as Warren Buffet pay capital gains and very little to no income taxes?

The longer you hold crypto curreny (or any asset for that matter) before you realize a gain the less tax you pay . It goes from 20% to 15%. If I had the ability to do so at this time to pay all of my taxes at the 15% level I would in comparison to the 30% I paid in income taxes last year.

Please take time to educate yourself before making bold and uninformed statements .

Hi @neil-rothbard..... Thanks for your advice...... but let me clarify this.

This Cryptocurrency Tax Fairness Act " appears for this reason :

“IT PROPOSES POLICYMAKERS TO COMBINE THE LOW TAX RATES OF A CAPITAL GAINS TAX WITH A DE MINIMUS EXEMPTION FOR TRANSACTIONS UNDER SOME NOMINAL AMOUNT”

People use bitcoins/cryptos for their daily transactions. Please take a big note on that ! So ask yourself, instead of using his FIAT currency, how many times Warren Buffer use his asset/property to buy SMALL things such buying books at dept store, buy a cup of coffee, buy his household needs and other daily expenses that could be thousands of transactions yearly ?

Transaction as a property/asset would create a huge headache for large swathes of cryptocurrency users that make many many regular SMALL transactions. Capital gains taxes work by calculating the difference in price between the time of purchase and time of sale, and taxing that amount.

If bitcoins were taxed as a property, these casual users would be placed in the same tax category as serious monetary speculators, complete with the burden of tracking and calculating substantial price fluctuations between their transactions. Users would then need to adequately document these price changes, prove they had been purchased and sold for the equivalent value in U.S. dollars on the dates claimed, and pay the subsequent tax on the capital gain for each transaction. (Although, there would be somewhat of a huge price decrease in that capital losses could at least be deducted from income tax season).

This situation is clearly unsustainable. It requires well-meaning yet understandably overwhelmed cryptocurrency users to comply with a massive reporting burden. It is not hard to see how one could “honestly make mistakes” reporting their cryptocurrency tax obligations, leading to potential punishment and fines.

If this CTFA passed, it would establish a de minimus tax exemption for all cryptocurrency transactions under $600 at the same time it gives a low tax rate of capital gains . This would allow everyday users of cryptocurrency to enjoy financial freedom without having the extreme burden of tracking and documenting all of their minor transactions !

Wow! I was looking for this information from so long. You explained it so well and covered this Crypto tax topic in such a great detail. Kudos!

thanks @cryptoqu33n, glad to know it :)

Hello, @sonny.dharmawan

Copied directly from [https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tips/tax-payments/tax-tips-for-bitcoin-and-virtual-currency/L1ZOgU00q](Turbo Tax )

"Bitcoin miners must report receipt of the virtual currency as income

Some people "mine" Bitcoins by using computer resources to validate Bitcoin transactions and maintain the public Bitcoin transaction ledger.

According to the IRS, when a taxpayer successfully “mines” Bitcoins and has earnings from that activity whether in the form of Bitcoins or any other form, he or she must include it in his gross income after determining the fair market dollar value of the virtual currency as of the day he received it. If a bitcoin miner is self-employed, his or her gross earnings minus allowable tax deductions are also subject to the self-employment tax."

exactly, that's what I mean @brianpsull
Thanks for the link

I see this as being a two-sided die here, while yes it will be good for the average investor being able to capitalize on his gains and get some FIAT out of it, this will surely open the door for crypto to become more mainstream and you will see more and more Wallstreet types coming into Crypto Trading world. When this happens you will surely see more and more laws being passed by the SEC with reguard to crypto. We will just have to wait and see how it pans out.

I always wondered when the IRS would get involved. Way too much money being made for them not to want their cut.

I think you still should not pay them anything if you invest in crypto.
But they do not concern me anyway, since I am not an American.

Its the same thing with people now wanting to have invested in BTC 2 years ago.. If federal institutions would have taxed cryptos about 2 years ago, they would've made millions off of it. Yet they are too slow.

They got involved back in 2014....

From an elementary school textbook on the reason for the revolutionary war: "The British government decided to make the American colonies pay a large share of the war debt from the French and Indian War. Through the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and other taxes, the British tried to collect taxes that the American people considered harsh." Hmmm... looks like our government has become exactly like the one we rejected. Maybe we should simply all refuse to pay the illegal double taxation.

It always take times to change, for now just enjoy all the process that will become a great history in the future.