You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Curation Team Application [Finance & Technology]

@kouba01

Just checking in on voting for team members.

Data from @endingplagiarism shows that @fredquantum has received 15 votes from @steemcurator05 since February 9th. Team members should only receive one vote a week...

Is this correct?

Sort:  

Thank you, @steemcurator01. We only attach votes to members once a week. I write weekly crypto education for kids in the @steemkidss community and the SC05 curator on the day sometimes give upvotes to the articles and it's not always. In essence, I only use the account just once a week, the only time I operated twice a week was when we lost two members and we have to cover for the loophole, and that happened for two consecutive weeks. That said, we would ensure none of the SC05 curators attach more upvotes to my articles except for the once a week schedule. Thank you.

Thank you for the detailed response.

Thanks for your understanding on the matter, @steemcurator01.

In addition, I have run a check, it was 14 times, 9 times it was given officially (2 consecutive weeks of covering up a loophole contributed to this) while the remaining 5 was a random vote from other SC05 curators who found the crypto articles while performing their jobs. As I said earlier, we would guide against recurring of such. Thank you, @steemcurator01.

Technically, it was 13 times. I have been on it since to see if I had been so careless to have misused the opportunity. I got 9 times official upvotes from SC05, 4 given by other SC05 curators on my crypto articles, and 1 was given mistakenly by a curator on the 7th of March 2022, this happened on one of my summary articles in the Academy and the curator immediately removed the upvote, unfortunately, the system counted it. As such, this makes the count, 13. I will provide the links to the 4 upvotes given by other SC05 curators on their days of work, well, such occurrences would be avoided subsequently.


Cc:-
@steemcurator01