Hi @c-change, I am completely open to healthy discussion-- that is the point of A1!

I support breaking up FB, Google, YT with anti-trust legislation, rather than promoting a regulatory bill, which IS NOT necessary for freedom of speech on social media platforms. Anyone who sends a lawyer's statement to YT, instantly gets their channel put back up, bc they have no true legal means of censoring based on supposed community guidelines. It is a lie and a sham. We need to break up these corporate monopolies rather than have new legislation to separate our 1st Am rights from our activity on the internet.

What evidence do you have that this IBOR will be beneficial? That it won't be harmful to our already given 1st Am right? That it won't grant AT&T the "right" to fry us with 5G?

Today, an important clause in the Omnibus Bill that was signed by Trump, pretty much nullifies our 4th amendment right to privacy. This is because 5G will make privacy impossible.

The Hitler vegan thing is really a goofy comparison! No offense! To NOT grock the massive power of At&t over the last century in breaching our rights to free speech and privacy is naive in the very least. This company is Rothschild-sized powerful.

If someone can show me just how this IBOR would be a necessary step to the accomplishment of #STORM, great! I am all ears!