First of all, you have never been blacklisted by Steemclenaers so I have no clue where this false information has come from.
You said that you will stop using these curated science tags/projects for these articles so downvote removed.
You were advised on how to quote properly.
You claim to be a journalist. No legitimate magazine/newspaper would allow such sloppy and unprofessional writing.
The writing is on the level of primary school student who has yet to learn how to quote properly.
Avoidance of using apostrophes and quotation marking seems to be premeditated attempt to make it difficult to distinguish what you have written and what is actually quoted.
Steem STEM project already banned your from curation before we even asked you to stop using science-curated tags.
Your whole activity on Steemit started with low quality copypasta. You were already asked to stop then. It is clear that you cannot write an article without copying and pasting 70-80% of it and using proper quotation. With remaining 20-30% often being just re-written sentences from the sources.
Using logical fallacy such as appeal to emotion by threatening of leaving Steemit is not going to work.
From your report on other Steemian, it is evident that you do not understand what plagiarism is and how to properly quote and write original content.
That article is well written as it uses the quotes and references in exactly the way it should be correctly used. Also at least 50% of the article are author's personal thoughts which are also not re-written sentences from someone else's articles (like yours). Also this Steemian has been verified to be the author of the blog were the article was written.
If you would read my remark, I never said that the quoting wasn´t correct technically, but not referencing from where the quote is taken from, that is what I noted.
I agree in principle that the article is well done.