New Physics Research Finds The Actual “God” Particle – Collective Evolution

• The Information:

  John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist on the Stanford College Faculty of Medication, printed an article titled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," which subsequently turned essentially the most broadly accessed article within the historical past.

• Mirror On:

  The company affect that has now taken over science. How a lot of our science is de facto legit? How a lot of it's false? How a lot of it's dogma?

Science at present, in all fields, is affected by corruption. But, most of the time, makes an attempt to create consciousness about scientific fraud — a problem that few journalists have been prepared to deal with — are met with the response, “Well, is it peer-reviewed?” Though good science ought to all the time be reviewed, utilizing this label as a type of credibility will be harmful, inflicting folks to dismiss new info and analysis instantaneously if it doesn’t have it, notably when that info counters long-held beliefs ingrained into human consciousness through mass advertising and marketing, schooling, and extra. Sadly, it’s turning into more and more obvious that we're being lied to in regards to the merchandise and medicines we use each day. For those who’re one who generally factors to the “peer-reviewed” label, then it's best to know that there are various researchers and insiders who've been creating consciousness about the issue with this label for years.

Who Says So? And From What Fields?

Many individuals have spoken up in opposition to the corporatization and politicization of science. For instance, Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a Swedish climatologist and former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, has voiced his concern that some scientists are, in accordance with an interview given to the Day by day Mail, “mixing up their scientific role with that of climate activist.” He claims that there are a number of indicators for the way “science is gradually being influenced by political views.” (source) Professor Joanna D. Haigh, a British physicist, professor of atmospheric physics at Imperial Faculty London, co-director of the Grantham Institute for Local weather Change, and former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, has additionally spoken up in regards to the politicization of local weather science. (source)

The Australian prime minister’s chief enterprise advisor has accomplished the identical, and so produce other politicians, like Senator James Inhofe, chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Setting and Public Works. You may learn extra about that story here.

Sadly, the mainstream vilifies such folks, and to nice impact.
Beneath is an glorious snippet of a lecture given by Richard Lindzen, one of many world’s high specialists within the discipline and lead creator of “Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,” Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change’s Third Evaluation Report on local weather change. He is aware of that each one local weather science we obtain is IPCC United Nations science. One of many scientists talked about on the senator’s checklist, on this video, he talks in regards to the politics of local weather science and the manipulation of knowledge — one thing that plagues all fields of science at present.

• Medical Science/Well being Science/Meals

Within the case of drugs, a whole lot of info has emerged exhibiting simply how a lot corruption actually goes on. The Editors-in-Chiefs of a number of main medical journals have been fairly blunt, with maybe among the finest examples coming from Dr. Richard Horton, the present Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet, who says, “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.” (source)

Dr. Marcia Angell, a doctor and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), additionally thought of one of the vital prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals on the earth, alongside The Lancet, has stated that “it's merely not attainable to consider a lot of the medical analysis that's printed, or to depend on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical tips. I take no pleasure on this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my twenty years as an editor of The New England Journal of Medication.” (source)

John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist on the Stanford College Faculty of Medication, printed an article titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” which subsequently turned essentially the most broadly accessed article within the historical past of the Public Library of Science (PLoS). (source)

Right here is one other nice quote:

“The medical occupation is being purchased by the pharmaceutical trade, not solely by way of the follow of drugs, but additionally by way of educating and analysis. The tutorial establishments of this nation are permitting themselves to be the paid brokers of the pharmaceutical trade. I believe it’s disgraceful.”

As you'll be able to see, this has been an issue for fairly a while.

A Couple of Examples:

Top-of-the-line examples of political affect over scientific publication comes from an episode involving Genetically Modified Maize. Monsanto printed a research a number of years in the past which presupposed to show the results of GMO maize on rats over a 90 day interval. They reported no in poor health results on the rodents from this food plan. Given the truth that there are not any long run research analyzing the well being dangers related to GMOs, impartial researchers then determined to conduct the identical research, with one distinction: Their research lasted over a 12 months fairly than a mere three months. Researchers discovered cases of severe liver and kidney damage, as well as hormonal disturbances, alongside the development of large tumours and mortality among the treatment groups. The research was printed in November of 2012, within the Journal of Meals and Chemical Toxicology, after which immediately retracted. After a whole bunch of scientists condemned the retraction, the U.S. didn't publish it. The research was then re-published in a number of peer-reviewed scientific journals (in Europe final 12 months [2014]), like Environmental Sciences Europe. That is why it shouldn’t be a shock that so many international locations in Europe have banned the growing of genetically modified crops. Many even have bans and/or extreme restrictions on importing GM merchandise, citing well being and environmental issues.

This truth was additionally made clear by WikiLeaks paperwork:

Resistance to the appearance of genetically modified meals has been pronounced throughout Europe. The continent options among the strictest laws governing the use and cultivation of GMO merchandise, and public skepticism about biotech items is kind of excessive – a truth not misplaced on American diplomats. In a prolonged report relationship from late 2007 , a cable issued by the State Division outlined its “Biotechnology Outreach Technique, ‘which, among other things, recognized the European Union’s ‘negative views on biology’ and dedicated as a nationwide precedence to limiting them (O7STATE160639).

Preliminary consideration paid to the State Division’s half in pushing industrial manufactures on its allies obscured the even greater function it performed in assuring a spot for genetically modified agricultural merchandise (GMOs) in a area that largely needed nothing to do with them. The American marketing campaign selling biotech merchandise was a worldwide effort. In all, some 1,000 paperwork from the Cablegate cache deal with this effort, a major variety of which originate in Europe. U.S. diplomats on the continent gave appreciable consideration to insuring the pursuits of American biotech companies in Europe – Whether or not via “education” applications, authorities lobbying, or outright coercion – in addition to stripping down European Union laws designed to behave as a bugger in opposition to them. Accessible cables printed by WikiLeaks counsel that america invests appreciable time, effort, and expense in its operations on behalf of the American biotech companies.

Learn extra about it from The WikiLeaks Files: The World According To U.S. Empire.

In 1996, Steven M. Druker, being a public curiosity legal professional and the Govt Director of the Alliance For Bio-Integrity, initiated a lawsuit in 1998 that compelled the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) to disclose its information on genetically engineered meals. He’s lately published a book on the lawsuit that gives particulars of his expertise. He has additionally launched the documents on his website, exhibiting the numerous hazards of genetically engineering meals and the issues within the FDA’s coverage. It’s referred to as Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public. There are a selection of examples to select from right here, however antidepressants make the highest of the checklist. Irving Kirsch, a lecturer in medication at Harvard Medical Faculty, printed a research declaring how “analyses of the published data and the unpublished data that were hidden by drug companies reveals that most (if not all) of the benefits are due to the placebo effect.” (source) One other research printed within the British Medical Journal by researchers on the Nordic Cochrane Heart in Copenhagen confirmed that pharmaceutical corporations weren't disclosing all info concerning the outcomes of their drug trials. Researchers checked out paperwork from 70 completely different double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and located that the complete extent of great hurt in medical research stories went unreported.

Tamang Sharma, a PhD pupil at Cochrane and lead creator of the research, stated: “We found that a lot of the appendices were often only available upon request to the authorities, and the authorities had never requested them. I’m actually kind of scared about how bad the actual situation would be if we had the complete data.” (source)

One other co-author of the research, Dr. Peter Gotzsche, who co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration (the world’s foremost physique in assessing medical proof), present in a separate evaluation that 100,000 folks in america die annually from the uncomfortable side effects of appropriately used pharmaceuticals, noting that “it’s remarkable that nobody raises an eyebrow when we kill so many of our own citizens with drugs.” He has printed many papers arguing that our use of antidepressants is inflicting extra hurt than good, and considering the current leaks concerning these medicine, it appears he's right.

Beneath is a short video of him elaborating on this downside:

Vaccines are getting extra consideration now than ever earlier than. In reality, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman of the World Mercury Project (WMP), lately introduced a $100,000 problem aimed toward placing an finish to the inclusion of mercury, a neurotoxin that's 100 occasions extra toxic than lead, in vaccines administered in the united statesand globally. It’s provided to anyone, together with journalists and scientists, who can present a research exhibiting that it's protected to inject mercury into infants. This might be troublesome, as a whole bunch of research (that had been additionally current on the press convention in print kind) present it's completely unsafe, and may considerably enhance the danger of growing neurodegenerative issues. You may learn extra about this here. A number of instances of vaccine fraud have been uncovered, however that is one thing you won't know given the truth that the mainstream media fully ignores these information, and vaccines are closely marketed. For instance, Lucija Tomljenovic, who has a PhD in biochemistry and is a senior postdoctoral fellow in UBC’s College of Medication, in addition to a medical investigator, uncovered paperwork that reveal vaccine producers, pharmaceutical corporations, and well being authorities have recognized about a number of risks related to vaccines however selected to withhold them from the general public. (source) However maybe one of many largest revelations in medical historical past, additionally sadly ignored by mainstream media, got here solely a few years in the past and remains to be making noise, because it ought to. Dr. William Thompson, a longtime senior CDC scientist, printed among the mostly cited pro-vaccine research, which confirmed that there was completely no hyperlink between the MMR vaccine and autism (Thompson, et al. 2007, Price, et al. 2010, Destefano, et al. 2004). Nevertheless, Dr. Thompson lately admitted that it was “the bottom level” in his profession when he “went along with that paper.” He went on to say that he and the opposite authors “didn’t report significant findings” and that he's “fully ashamed” of what he did. He was “complicit and went together with this,” and regrets that he has “been part of the issue.” (source)(source)(source) A research with revised info and no knowledge omitted was printed by Dr. Brian Hooker (a contact of Dr. Thompson) within the peer reviewed journal Translational Neurodegeneration, and it discovered a 340% elevated threat of autism in African American boys receiving the Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. The research has since been retracted, across the similar time this controversy arose. You may learn the complete research here, though, unsurprisingly, it has since been retracted. Thompson’s attorneys, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Bryan Smith of Morgan & Morgan, additionally launched an announcement from Dr. Thompson, which talked about Hooker: “I've had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker during the last 10 months concerning research the CDC has carried out concerning vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes together with autism spectrum issues. I share his perception that CDC decision-making and analyses needs to be clear.” (source) he needed to invoke whistleblower safety and turned intensive company information over to Congress. He stated that, for the previous decade, his superiors have pressured him and his fellow scientists to lie and manipulate knowledge to hide a causal hyperlink between vaccines and mind accidents, together with autism. Ultimate Ideas As you'll be able to see, scientific fraud is an enormous downside throughout the board, and this text has solely supplied a number of examples. The issue is not only with GMOs and vaccines — it impacts cosmetics, meals, cleansing provides, and a lot extra. How have so many merchandise, which trigger so a lot hurt, been authorized by the businesses which are tasked to guard us? There are such a lot of books on this matter, however they don’t get the eye they deserve, for the reason that main mainstream media shareholders are similar to these of your entire well being trade. Why would they bash their very own merchandise on their very own nationwide tv networks? The facility of company America has taken over virtually each side of our lives. For those who’re questioning what we will do about it, effectively, I consider step one is consciousness. There's nonetheless a plethora of data that most people is totally unaware of, but when we backtrack to a decade in the past, info that was once thought of a conspiracy is now merely truth. An amazing instance is the company takeover of science, as mentioned on this article, however one other one may very well be the Snowden Leaks on mass surveillance, or 9/11. Research at the moment are being printed by physicists and engineers concerning that occasion. Consciousness makes it tougher for the elite to control us. As soon as we grow to be conscious of one thing, we will cease it. For instance, have a look at Genetically Modified Meals and the pesticides that go together with them. As quickly because the lots turned conscious of their risks, they started to alter their purchasing habits. Now, most international locations all over the world have fully banned these meals. It’s troublesome to simply accept that there are unseen powers, motivated by their very own greed and lust for energy, which are doing us hurt disguised nearly as good. It is just when we grow to be conscious of how we're being harmed and alter our purchasing habits — hurting their backside line — that they modify their techniques. Then again, it’s encouraging to know that when we do come collectively for a typical aim, something will be completed, and we truly do have the potential and energy to alter our world.