I don't know about a lot of these translations bro,

I have skimmed through the roughly 350 pages of Agenda 21 the other day, most of those things apply to "developing nations" not the first world.

1. is a list of typical national agencies who are responsible for managing marine activities

2. is a list of stakeholders who should be involved in decision making process, including women and scientists, so that it is not a bunch of white businessmen making all the decisions.

3. a request that developing nations practice sustainable development of the coasts, this mostly deals with things like controlling runoff from farming and raw sewage from cities being dumped along the coast, because those things are bad for the environment for all the tax slaves who depend on the sea.
   Are poor tax slaves the ones who build up coastal developments?

4. Fishermen will often balk at fisheries management at first but when you do it right in the long run you have much bigger catches, a fishery is a resource that must be managed, especially in the developing nations that this applies to, because otherwise Chinese trawlers will just show up and fish the place out completely, leaving nothing behind for the natives who depend on fishing for sustenance.

5. is about ships not dumping oil and bilge water indiscriminately, that's a good thing because that is a source of water pollution and invasive species, if you don't own a commercial vessel or offshore oil rig then this does not apply to you.

" If a large corporation like BP destroys millions of livelihoods and does incalculable damage to the Gulf Of Mexico with a massive oil spill, just slap them on the wrist and have them pay for the next cocktail party. "
"ET: BP will pay approximately $4.5 billion and plead guilty to manslaughter and other criminal charges as part of a settlement with the U.S. government over the deadly Deepwater Horizon rig explosion and massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, "
So what should happen to people who litter on the beach? nothing?

6."conserve and increase" not "divvy up" this is a directive that developing nations should manage their fisheries with a goal of increasing the catch through proper management and sustainable practices. For example some means of fishing are very destructive to the habitat and so you would want to ban those and enforce those bans while encouraging other methods, in the long run this increases the catch and benefits everyone and the environment. Managing fisheries is not a malicious plot.
7.This is about trying to reduce agricultural, factory and sewage runoff from being dumped in the sea; this mostly affects factory owners, corporate farmers and municipalities.
8.This is just about academics sharing their data and findings, the oceans are large and all interconnected, it makes sense that researchers should share data and findings. How is scientists monitoring water quality and sharing their findings with each other and the public harming anyone? It's not people they are surveilling, it's water quality, what is the danger if the government gets ahold of that water quality data? It's not like it's secret either, this directive says it should be shared!
9.Just a system for monitoring water quality, its not a bad thing to monitor water quality, that's one to find out if some factory or farm is polluting and/or monitor climate change.

This thing was signed in 1992 and we had 8 years of Obama loving the UN, why did it take them over 25 years to start burning people's houses in America down with lasers and where is the part that says that local governments in the first world should secretly burn down people's houses with lasers?