You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Parque Avellaneda
Bullshit.
The text contains the same information, but is obviously a different text. Probably you should contact some spanish speaker before pasting this crap here just because some proper names and dates coincide.
The post sound as if the author had read the information, either on the webpage you call "source" or, more likely, in original source of the information i.e. the history books that the webpage mentions at the end, and then recall it when writing it here. More or less what any serious author would do.
Word on the street is that OP may be recycling a previously published work. If so, do you think that sort of thing adds unique value to the blockchain?
I don't think either of us want Steem devolving into a place where folks just recycle their previous works they had published previously. If I wanted to read work that was already published, we can just go to the library.
I mean folks can do whatever the hell they want I guess but, if it's recycled, there is a good chance someone else will think it doesn't really deserves to be rewarded highly over content that is novel or exclusive to the Steem blockchain.
If this is novel content, great! It shouldn't be flagged. People kiss and make n with our lives. Concur?
Yeah, sure. He should change hystorical and geographical facts in order to make them "novel"...