You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin advocates for Child Porn!!!! ETH 🔥... Try EOS
Your comment smells like a butthurt Ethereum fan who just found out the guy making the most money from that scheme IS AN ADVOCATE for CHILD PORN by his own words. You see you came here, saw this post and said, what? Why would I investigate any of this myself when I can leave a stupid comment and be made to look like an ass later? Well if you had clicked on the link to the tweets by Vitalik, you would have seen this in the exchange:
So no this is not a "witch hunt" this is called journalism where I source my facts. Next time check the story out yourself before accusing people of a "witch hunt".
I might be a fan or I might not. Or anything between and you will never know.
On the other hand your post calls "try EOS" on multiple places (I have nothing against EOS and Im invested in it). That leads me to a slight suspicion you might be biased.
I still dont see the advocation. He said "I can argue" not "I believe or I think".
Look, I can argue Vitalik is a child porn advocate or that he runs Eth. in a very uncetralized way and I can agree or disagree with that. The point is I can argue the other side too.
Did you ever try to argue the opposite side of the topic even if you didnt agree with it? Can I argue just for the sake of argument without being marked as an advocate of that thing? .....if not, "bravo" to free speech.
I apologise for my harsh first comment.
I always look at both sides of the argument, and in this case he is just flat out wrong for saying what he did and I am calling him out on it.
Your first comment wasn't too harsh, it was spot on. The twisting of what was actually tweeted to what titusfrost is claiming it means is ridiculous.
How did I twist what he said? Please explain that? @blocktrades?
Just read the top comment on your post by @rapshmelth, it summarized my thoughts pretty well...