Dear @senehasa, below is the detailed assessment of your submission.
| Criteria | Marks | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Story start to finish | 4.85/5 | Excellent |
| Originality & Uniqueness | 2.8/3 | Satisfactory |
| Presentation | 1/1 | Excellent |
| My observation | 0.85/1 | You diverged from the boss's original request. He asked for demand-based pricing with promotions, but your team built purpose-based social pricing. It was creative, but not quite what was asked. |
| Total | 9.5/10 |
Feedback
- You did a really good job making the story engaging, with well-defined team roles and natural conversations. What held you back a little was the lack of deeper suspense or a major twist, and the fact that your solution drifted away from the boss's original request. Still, this was a creative and enjoyable read.
I understood the original request, but I added purpose-based pricing because I wanted to show how apps can care for people, in addition to money. My idea was to bring a creative, human touch to the story, as it is a fiction writing contest. Anyway, thank you very much for your feedback.