You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SLC21/WK6: Understanding Burns: Types, Causes, and First Aid Responses "
Student Name: @yoelmo26
Overall grade: 8.7
Plagiarism Check: Pass
AI Use:
| Question | What the Student Did Well | Areas for Improvement | Grading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question 1 | Provided the course of action in this specific situation . Good work | Important details are missing such as the student didn't mention prioritizing their own safety first. This is a very important step. There's no mention of gloves or a wrapper. There's no reasoning given for the classification of the type of burn. | [Grade: 1.5] |
| Question 2 | the student listed down the course of action for an electrical burn. | You mentioned using cold water. One shouldn't use cold water as it can cause hypothermi | [Grade: 1.8] |
| Question 3 | Listed the steps of managing an emergency chemical burning scenario. | The problem in the first aid was not flushing the burn site for a longer period of time. Atleast 20 minutes of flushing is recommended for a chemical burn. You didn't mention using PPEs or prioritizing your own safety first. | [Grade: 1.4] |
| Question 4 | The student managed to present their logic in choosing the answer. The ethics as well as the Triage dictate that the patient with a 2nd degree burn should be treated first as the patient with a third degree burn has his nerves damaged so currently he is not in severe pain whereas the patient with a 2nd degree burn might be going through excruciating pain and if not attended immediately would be left with grave consequences. Good reasoning | [Grade: 2] | |
| Question 5 | the student managed to present an infographic. Infographics in the medicine field serve as important tool for having access to more information in a single place. These are typically necessary to have as a first aider. | [Grade: 2] |
General Feedback: The student has shown a good understanding of this week's course. I definitely enjoyed reading your article. There were a few shortcomings which I'm sure will be avoided in the upcoming posts.
Thank you.
Regards,
@huzaifanaveed1
Hola gracias por su evaluación pero me gustaría aclarar algo mencionado, usted dice que mencioné usar agua fría en el caso 2 pero no es cierto, si revisa bien puede leer que en la parte de las acciones que NO haría está la de No usar agua fría.
No aplicaría agua para enfriar la piel, porque puede causar shock o empeoramiento de la quemadura
No sé si fue su traductor pero en esta parte lo que indica que hice no es lo que de verdad hice en mi tarea, entonces creo que en esa parte debería considerar su apreciación.
Muchas gracias por su atenta evaluación
Thank you for going through the assessment. I appreciate the students who take out time for reading the remarks.
You're right. It's probably the translator. I had exactly the same issues last week as well, translating spanish to english. Hope you understand.
Have a good day.
Si los traductores suelen causar problemas pero que bueno que podemos resolver, en ese caso no se debería de reconsiderar la nota calificativo para esa pregunta o parte de la tarea dónde puso 1.8 ? Porque si lo que respondí está totalmente bien creo que en cuanto a nota debería tener la correcta también.
Y me disculpo por preguntar.
@huzaifanaveed1