You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Response to @michelle.gent still not accepting the downvotes for what they are.
First of all I dream transisto in my wet dreams I dream him voting me with his mega vests over and over and over , next time you want to defend something use your actual account.
This is my original account next time you are going to write an argument I really reccomend you to state your stuff in more logical manners.
I, unlike I guess most people on steemit, have only one account. I don't know who you think I am, but I am not them. I take comments as I see them. Prior to my comment to you I did check to see how long your account was active. My comment though still stands, just because you have been on steemit for a year and a half does not mean you have seen all the steem people. Like I mentioned, if you don't read fiction then it is unlikely you have seen her name. We follow who, and what we are interested in. If you have no interest fiction, (which it seems most of the commenters on this post do not follow), then you are unlikely to have seen her.
If you can make bullshit accusations like we are trying to impress transisto I can claim that I know every high reputation account in Steemit.
yes you absolutely can. Just as @transisto and @berniesanders can claim any bullshit they want about @michelle.gent, and others and rile people up to the point of divide and conquer. It's all here for people to read and understand and make and draw their own conclusions. I drew my own conclusion, right or wrong, a stand against one individual affecting the votes of many individuals, and those that support their activities.
I don't even need fingers to count the number of people I know on steemit, it is zero. I see people use and abuse others on steemit, just like I saw during my short stints on other social media. Actions, (as they say) Speak Louder Than Words.