You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Terrorists, homegrown and hearing voices.
Ofcourse it doenst shut down the blockchain but his anoying little upvotes DO have an huge impact because he votes after a few seconds....
Because of his actions the curators make almost nothing (6.52% instead of the normal 49 -50%)
Im not saying he cant upvote anything to "keep his legacy" here on steemit im just saying to change the fact that it hurts other people is causing his "legacy" to be EXTREMELY anoying and certainly not helping his causes and believes.
So please @sqube stop being a little shit and fucking everyone over like your complaining about in your post that other people are fucking shit over.
i just dont think that HE is the reason that 43 percent of the post payout was returned. Thats about 5 steem payout i doubt his miniscule account can be causing millions in losses across the board but if thats what you think then this blockchain needs a new fork, becuase thats a very easy way to esentially destroy someones earnings. why not do it with 1000 accounts put 1 steem on each and just shut the entire network down.
** as my understanding hes losing his own curation???
How is the reward pool split between authors and curators?
Up to 50% of a post's payout is awarded to curators (the people who upvoted the post) as a reward for discovering the content. The other 50% is awarded to the author.
If curators vote for a post within the first 5 minutes of it being created, a portion of their curation reward remains in the rewards pool for other authors/curators. This portion is linear to the age of the post between 0 and 5 minutes. As an example: upvoting at two minutes will donate 60% of your potential curation reward back to the rewards pool.