You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Geoengineering Photo Contests - Win STEEM! - Expose the Nightmare!
Is this a falsifiable theory? Not being falsifiable is why I have rejected this in the past...
Is this a falsifiable theory? Not being falsifiable is why I have rejected this in the past...
I guess I may not completely understand the question. I understand a falsifiable theory and that's basically if you see a black swan you can no longer say all swans are white as the black swan falsifies the theory that all swans are white.
Is geoengineering falsifiable? That is hard for me to answer because I do not have all the facts and I have to weed through a lot of disinformation to form my conclusions. With swans the best someone could do to keep the theory that all swans are white is to say that the black swan is not really a swan at all, even though careful observation would say otherwise.
So are all of the lingering aerosol trails a special mix of metals and other forms of particulates? Well the actual science seems to say that the form of jet engines that are used today, High Bypass Turbo Fan, are only able to create a condensation trail in only the rarest of conditions. When we witness how a so called condensation trails fans out and all together blanket the sky with an unnatural haze that leads me to thinking that this is something other than condensation.
If you really look at the powers that deny this, all they are saying is that they are not anything but simple condensation. In my opinion they are just trying to convince us that the black swan is really not a swan after all.
This is not a swan, it is a long necked, feathered, water floater.
This is not a chemtrail. It is a particulate trail laid out by aerial aerosol dispersal methods for the purpose of geoengineering.
It sounds like you do understand the question. Topics like this lose my interest when there is no 'black swan' to change the understanding. It isn't always easy to find them.
Thanks for your moment, @freebeerfridays