Geoengineering Series #10 – Agendas

in #geoengineeringseries7 years ago (edited)

GeoengineeringSeries 10.jpg

 The topics of Agendas, the official documents of UN, and geoengineering seem unrelated at the first glance. What are these agendas that are presented to humankind as some sort of ultimate and rescuing solution plan? To preserve biodiversity of the Noah’s ark we live upon? To keep what was once given to us by destroying it? Whatever we do, we participate a bit in the demolishment program that is an ongoing process for many thousands of years and seems to be in the last stages. Maybe it is the consequence of the exponential growth of the population, but maybe it depends more on the exponential growth of the profits which cannot exist without the demand for exponential growth of sold products by which the pollution is worldwide. The more we produce and consume, the more we pollute. We cannot say that we don’t destroy by causing pollution. There is plastic particles found in drinking water worldwide and especially seafood, there is aluminum found in drinking water in the Shasta region in USA, but it was also found in soil, animals, and plants. We pollute daily by what we do, because we don’t live a natural life anymore, but then just how many people on the planet live an entirely natural life and still know how.   

On the surface the agendas have been looking like a benevolent guideline for the future more sustainable development. Last year it started to look like geoengineering is used to carry out the Post-2015 Development Agenda, Agenda 2021 and 2030 for sustainable development, and the goals set in the UN conference 1976 on Human Settlements, or at least part of it, the goals set in Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB, 1971). Those agendas are carried out worldwide. In Agenda 2021 we also find that every state is obliged to take care to keep the population in approved amount and it’s up to them how to achieve those goals. In the UN document Our Common Future, Chapter 4: Population and Human Resources:   

 More recent document on this topic is Population 2030, Demographic challenges and opportunities for sustainable development planning, where a trend towards urbanization is predicted. 

The Agendas Unfolding 

There are a couple of videos that show that the areas of California fires correspond to the municipal plan to build a smart city there. The global map of wildfires shows that in 2017 fires were not only in California, they were also in Canada, Portugal and Northern Spain, Russia, and Dalmatia (Croatia).  

But this is not the only way to chase people out of their more »in nature« habitat and round them into the cities. One that pops up in various places on the Earth is to get rid of farmers, what is seemingly an ongoing process in India and USA. In USA the suicide rate professions in agriculture is the highest among all professions (study 2012); in India they are doing it due to genetically modified crops and terminator seeds, and it looks like somewhat the same is a plan for Africa. If you think there is so much better in Europe, then I must disappoint you: no, it isn’t. It seems somewhat similar in China and Australia.  Actually it seems like epidemy going on among farmers around the planet. When reading those stories it starts to appear like some attack on farmers as though the GMO and the terminator seeds (Genetic Use Restriction Technology  - GURT) weren’t bad enough. 

When the wildfires, frost, sleet, hail, drought, excessive rain impact the farmers only income from woods, fruits or vegetables and crops year after year then the farm usually goes to sell. Last year (2017) the prices of food rose due to drought and flood; in Ireland there was too much rain and the farmers couldn't harvest the potato, elsewhere the wildfires burnt down the woods, or the crop of corn fell for 25% due to drought, or the harvest of fruit was almost annihilated due to early frost or sleet. If this is happening in one year then the farmers and the nature might recover soon, but if it is one year after the other, then the recovering process takes much longer. Sometimes it is not only the weather; it could be the some construction works: building of infrastructure, factories, sustainable settlements, shopping malls, etc. Then sometimes farmers sell willingly, and sometimes by force. After all, most probably every state has legislation that incorporates the following from the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements , June, 1976.    

So, is it just nature? Or is it a sustainable destruction agenda by those who want to control the weather and introduce novel technologies, like entirely robotized farm production or precision agriculture (digital agriculture), where actually very few people will be needed for all the work that has to be done on the farm to deliver food to the markets? Or is it some long term plan, wherein the weather modification is just one front in this long-term operation?  

Geoengineering Enforcing Genetic Modification? 

Let’s take a look. And then you decide who is who and where in this are you, and if you believe it at all. Here are some excerpts ordered in a row.  

Above excerpts from Mark M. Rich, Planetary Sabotage and Human Extermination 

Both above excerpts are from 70-years Old Prophecy, while the description from the last paragraph is to enfold 336.000 years from 1944.

So, again, is it just nature? Or is it carried out by Black Brotherhood? And we humans are just the physical extension executing their plan and the execution target at the same time? And the higher on the hierarchical or societal ladder we climb the better we execute the plan for the elite to prosper? Or is it the workings of the White Brotherhood?  See, this is not about white or non-white race. In the text, Peter Deunov explains that people from the White Brotherhood are born with “pentagonal star above his head, or on his forehead, or a circle of light around his head, or light aura along his entire body; that aura is also visible during the day; he emits light around himself”, and those from the Black Brotherhood don’t have any star as seen in spirit. Or, is it a 70-years old prophecy in the making? Or, some other prophecy or the obstruction of what was once meant to be, of the reason of our existence and the way we should be living? Like this one of the Chitauri that serve the Jahbulon

The only thing I don’t quite see is who going to repair all the destruction done on the planet: to the waters - the rivers of life, to the air, to the plants, to the animals, as well as humans. Do they consider unlimited beauty only, if the living beings are turned into something not natural to them and then remotely controlled? 

This post is part of a series in Geoengineering Series in an effort to present idea that people should start understanding that the sky and the oceans should remain intact, as well as the Earth as a whole, thus also the mainland. But, because humans can’t just dismiss all the industry and construction, and all the rest, we can’t declare the whole Earth a national park, even if we would most probably be way better off by doing so. Even if it is already some 100 years or more too late it is still worth a try. The way I see it, is to give the sky and the oceans the legal status of a national park where chemical experiments with weather or anything else are officially not permitted and not-tolerated, including influencing tropospheric rivers by electromagnetic means. But to whom such a motion/demand in a petition form should be delivered to?  

Previous posts in geonegineering series:  

Geoengineering series #9 - Legislation Regarding Geoengineering 

Geoengineering Series 8 – Photographic Intermezzo for the 1 -10% 

Geoengineering Series #7 – The Abuse of Struck and Unstruck Sound  

Geoengineering Series #6 – Modern vs. Ancient Weather Weapons  

Geoengineering Series #5 – Trading Geoengineered Weather?  

Geoengineering Series #4 - Poisoning the Garden of Eden  

Geonegineering Series #3 – Using Frequencies  

Geoengineering Series #3a – Using Frequencies (a frequencies table)  

Geoengineering Series #2 – Weather Modification Jobs  

Geoengineering Series #1 – Global Warming and Climate Change      

Sort:  

I am guessing you have a solution?
How much does the initial start up cost of the solution amount to?
I do not dispute with you the realism of anything you have said. I am more from a perspective of, we have the problems issue dilemma or other title put on a situation. With such negative progress made in these manner, it is unwise to rely once again on those who were relied upon to begin to find this solution and if found implement it.
From there you just go back to talking about conspiracy and theory, and the solution is forgot about again.
with that understanding of my view I ask the above questions.
I would appreciate a reply to this.

Well, I suggested a solution as I see fit. I don't have the computer skills to run a campaign. And no, I don't know how much the initial start up costs are or could be. If you would have read all of those below mentioned posts, you'd find out that there have been campaigns already to stop this atmospheric geoengineering, and the organization thrive.org is preparing a new one.
I don't talk about any conspiracy in this post and I don't know where you see the conspiracy. I don't see any conspiracy in their open announcements of what they plan to. The only thing I see is to know as much about it as possible, understand it as much as I can, the plan they have (as some of them are even willing to kill for it - and they have announced it openly), to chose myself and for myself. I can't do much more then to put my message out and try to explain that this abuse of the sky and the oceans should stop. I would be good if such type of operations would stop on the ground, too.

I was not writing against you :). Friendly here, I was more enquiring. Like you I do not have full understanding, For conspiracy, I mean the conversation goes to what others do and takes away from needs to be done. Of all the campaigns above and for so many other causes of legitimate value, I see the same thing tho. The funding needed to change things even if 100% went to the project are sure to fail later without further support. If I am successful here in Steemit, Which I am hopefully optimistic about over time. I might just live to see the world begin to change. We just need enough people to want.

And what kind of change would you want to see? I don't see much possibility as those running this operation (geoengineering) have limitless funds. I guess, in Tading Geoengineered Weather post is a description how they deem to use cryptocurrencies for it.

I can see ways to get there, Initial funding would have to come from outside of myself right now. I see three possible routes or combination or combined ways to go about it. They all revolve around social economics foundation.I have done two initial blogs on this.

https://steemit.com/crypto/@brayias/let-s-start-a-social-economics-foundation

https://steemit.com/socialeconomics/@brayias/serious-or-just-all-talk

Its is a big thing trying to get what is inside down on the paper for me.
on one page it shows the possibilities, these results are achievable in the right environments for projects.

greetings, thank you for posting

Your Post Has Been Featured on @Resteemable!
Feature any Steemit post using resteemit.com!
How It Works:
1. Take Any Steemit URL
2. Erase https://
3. Type re
Get Featured Instantly – Featured Posts are voted every 2.4hrs
Join the Curation Team Here

Resteemed by @resteembot! Good Luck!
Curious?
The @resteembot's introduction post
Get more from @resteembot with the #resteembotsentme initiative
Check out the great posts I already resteemed.

Congratulations @irastra! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Thank you so much for this valuable work! Resteem ~ Follow ~
Upvote! Warmly @trye

@steemit-untalented

I'm sharing your article in a new article I'm writing.