You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SC-S29|Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 4: History Glitch
Thank you for your participation in SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 4: History Glitch.
Here is the evaluation of @marwene – “SC-S29|Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 4: History Glitch”, following the official Week 4 rubric.
Evaluation Summary
| Criteria | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. SteemAtlas Pin & Historical Context | 1.8 / 2.0 | Excellent location clarity (Médersa Slimania, Tunis, Tunisia) with SteemAtlas pin. Strong thematic “history glitch” framing (not time-travel, but misattribution/renaming of identity). Good historical roots (Carthaginian → Roman → Beylical continuity). Small improvement: add one concrete anchor (a specific construction date / patron / era for the medersa itself) to strengthen the “verifiable history” layer alongside the cultural argument. |
| 2. Creativity of Mission & Hidden Numerical Clue | 1.3 / 2.0 | Creativity is high: the “glitch” is narrative distortion rather than ruins/monuments, and you prove it visually through layers/repairs on the wall very original for Week 4. However, the Week 4 requirement asks for a hidden number or date as a playful puzzle. Your post mentions periods (Carthaginian/Roman/Beylical) but doesn’t clearly hide one target number/date for readers to guess. Add a small riddle pointing to one year/number (e.g., medersa date, a Beylical-era year, or another meaningful number tied to the place). |
| 3. Speem.watch Proof Video (20–60s) – One Fact & One Detail | 2.4 / 2.5 | Strong compliance: you explicitly state what you do in the video (fact: Tunisian earthenware, not Moroccan) and show the physical evidence on the walls (layering, different periods, repairs/pattern shifts). Very close to perfect. Minor deduction only because the post doesn’t confirm the clip length in-text (20–60s) and doesn’t point to one “single best” proof detail (e.g., “zoom on X section”). |
| 4. Storytelling Quality (Past and Present Meet) | 2.4 / 2.5 | Excellent writing and structure: clear thesis (“the wall speaks, the story is broken”), strong argument flow, and the “identity renamed” idea feels like a true modern “glitch.” Great use of photo sequencing (wide → layers → motifs → textures) and a human moment (kafteji) that anchors the present. To reach full: add 2–3 sensory lines (sound/temperature/light) inside the medersa to make the reader feel the place even more. |
| 5. Engagement (Solve others’ clues / thoughtful comments) | 0.9 / 1.0 | Engagement seems active (you discuss details with commenters, and you mention/comment on other entries). Full point would require visible proof of at least two comments where you attempted to guess other participants’ hidden numbers/dates (links or screenshots). |
Final Score: 8.8 / 10
Remarks
This is a high-quality Week 4 entry with one of the most original interpretations of “History Glitch” (heritage survives, but the label is corrupted). To push this into 9.3–9.7, do one key upgrade:
- Add a clear hidden number/date puzzle (one target only), subtly embedded in your narrative.
— Geo-Quest Mystery Jury