You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5 : Route of Clues
Thank you for your participation in SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5: Route of Clues.
Here is the updated evaluation of @jamal7 – “SC-S29 | Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 5 : Route of Clues”, following the official Week 5 rubric.
Evaluation Summary
| Criteria | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. SteemAtlas Pin & Route Description | 1.4 / 2.0 | The SteemAtlas pin code is included with coordinates for Hillview Park (Chattogram). However, the Week 5 “route” is not described step-by-step as a mini-walk with clear start and end points (directions, short distance between stops, approximate walking time). Improvement: define a short route inside the park (Gate → Neem tree benches → Pond/boat area) with simple walking guidance. |
| 2. Creativity of Mission & Hidden Order Puzzle (A→B→C) | 0.6 / 2.0 | You mention three key moments (gate curiosity, neem tree/benches, pond/boats), but the hidden clue should be an order puzzle that lets readers deduce the correct sequence from hints. Here, the “three questions” are stated in a straightforward way and do not function as an order puzzle. Improvement: mix the three moment descriptions and add logical clues (sound changes, shade/light, before/after entering, distance) so readers can reconstruct A→B→C. |
| 3. Speem.watch Proof Video (20–60s) – Three Moments in Sequence | 1.8 / 2.5 | A proof video link (IPFS via Speem) is provided. To reach full points, the video must clearly show the three key moments in a clean sequence (Moment 1 → Moment 2 → Moment 3) and meet the 20–60 second requirement. In the provided content, the exact duration and the clarity of the three-moment sequence are not confirmed. |
| 4. Storytelling Quality (Walking the Route) | 1.6 / 2.5 | The post captures a pleasant atmosphere and family visit feelings, with details about the park environment. To score higher, make the narration more like a guided walk (first… then… finally…) and keep it tightly centered on the three chosen moments. Also, Week 5 requires 2–4 personal photos, but the post includes far more than that, which reduces compliance and readability. |
| 5. Engagement (Solve others’ routes / thoughtful comments) | 0.0 / 1.0 | Engagement is not shown. Week 5 requires participants to comment on at least two other entries and attempt to solve their order puzzles. No evidence of that appears here. |
Final Score: 5.4 / 10
Remarks
This entry has a valid location pin and a real visit with good park visuals, but it needs stronger Week 5 alignment: a clearly defined mini-route, a true hidden order puzzle based on three moments, a clearly sequenced proof video, and compliance with the 2–4 photo rule. Completing engagement (solving two routes in comments) would also raise the score.
— Geo-Quest Mystery Jury