You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Gridcoin Joint Marketing Initiative Passes
Only 2.7% of the Gridcoin network voted to support it, far less than the minimum voter participation for foundaiton polls. Usually closer to 20% yields network consensus on the matter - 2.7% is insufficient.
Creating new polls where the marketing initiative is broken down into separate proposals, or a longer poll duration for the same poll would help get sufficient voter participation. That and increased community outreach.
I'm just reading the poll and since there are no clearly defined and accessible parameters that say what makes a legitimate poll, that's all there is to go by. I might agree with your argument, but if there are requirements and processes, they need to be clearly defined and accessible so there can be no confusion.
Perhaps we need to make a proposal around acceptable poll parameters that is defined by:
If the proposal is put together well enough, it will attract enough vote weight that it would be a futile task to challenge its results. If this parameter poll is accepted, then poof! we have clearly defined parameters for future polls.
Next we would need the make the information regarding the parameters readily accessible and visible to anyone looking to make a poll.
What do you think?
That is because you are newer and shits all over the place... Maybe Gridcoin being decentralized but its info is not such a great idea. Having to look at slack , wiki , steemit , irc , and find the damn end of the inter webs just to find all possible relevant information does not help the project. It's there , that 20% vote weight min has been there and is there and there is a wiki page under the gridcoin.us domain that says it.. I think C_M is a horrible childish leader but will back him on this one.. You can't just join and think all your ideas are going to pass.. Hell people might even steal them and take credit. I think you are trying to jump in and do to much with knowing to little and going off half cocked.
Sorry , www.gridcoin.us does not take suggestion's or advise on site information or updates such as use its own forum / ircd / drop wiki and really TBH since its opensource and there is no official leader and honestly gridcoin.us and gridcoin.science are offical as each other and we are all equal and you do not have to agree or disagree with anyone or anything facts are facts.
www.lmgtfy.com really is your friend with information because its all there if you take a moment before you tell everybody else what they need to do , makes you look dumb as hell when its all there and been done.
I don't understand why this rule exists. Would it not make more sense to require either a minimum duration, or a minimum participation? Even the rebase attracted only 24% participation, and that was probably the most significant and debated poll in ages.
24% > 20% thus it's at least hit the minimum given the severity of its proposals.