Sort:  

Phenomenal work, thank you! This must have taken a lot of work. I've been thinking about trying to relate the performances of different kinds of processors on different projects and this is exactly the kind of data I need. I'm sure many others will find it useful as well.

Thanks @ilikechocolate, I hope indeed that this article can help people to determine how much RAC ouput their CPU can produce.

E5-2650L v3 has 12 cores/24 threads.

I have updated the table, thanks for the feedback @ilikechocolate.

Such a big table!

Xeon E5645 has 6 cores / 12 threads, not 4.

Thanks @hotbit, I have updated the table. :)

very interesting approach! far more accurate that the method described a few days ago by cautilus

i have a working prototype of a mining calculator based on that method. basing it on this one would be preferable.

I just think a joint effort in collecting the data and/or making it usable would be nice!
Are you planing a publicly accessible database/API for this information?

or github repo for the code or the data?

I could offer some hosting/database usage and some coding time (mainly js, node.js, html, css, sql and elasticsearch etc.) ...

one additional feature i have build in in my calculator: I use a benchmark database with roughly 3000 CPUs. If i want to calculate an estimated reward for a CPU i don't have boinc data for, i calculate the rac per benchmark point for every CPU i have boinc data for (for a given project) and then use an average of that data to calculate the estimated rac of that CPU based on the benchmark points.

anyways, thanks for this great work!

Thanks @holger-will, I will make the WUs available on github shortly and share it with the community. Concerning the code to fetch the data, it is based on Autoit and I think it is too crude. I have other ideas how to automate the process, which I will share with everybody in the near future.

would it be usefull to have a dedicated screen scraper for exactly this type of data? My code is based on node.js and it could easily be extended to support the data you used, and can be published via npm for example...

Looking forward to your ideas!

My RAC was considerably lower on Ryzen. That's odd.

Thanks @ragnrokdel, can you share which Ryzen CPU you are using and RAC you're achieving? Besides is SRBase the only project you're running 100% of the time (no heavy game usage or other CPU intensive apps)?

This raises one question... on http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/top_hosts.php the top host is a Ryzen 7 1800X with a rac of 384,196.47 ... how is this even possible?

The calculated RAC for this host is 733,599 but it will never achieve this because of the results it is producing:

  • 49565 valid WU
  • 77591 invalid WU

Another intersting element is that it is using Darwin as compared to the rest of the of the top 100 using Win/Linux.

I won't judge here but it would be interesting for the SRBase project owner to investigate this.

based on your table the calculated RAC for that type of processor is 49734...
If you look at the WUs of this host, there is something very fishy about it... the CPU times are waaaaaayyyy to short compared to everyone else on the list. And the host is on top and has no active WUs

the Wu versions (v0.21) seem strange, there is no v0.21 all other host are crunching on v0.20 !?

ohhhh... and it acquired all it's points on four days!!!!! thats for 127156 WUs only for this host...

this would be interesting for the gridcoin pool as well as the host is apparently mining for the pool and "stealing" MAG from everyone!

all that said, this is either a bug in SRBase or the SRBase developers making themself some GRC ;-)

ok... the assumption that there is no v0.21 was wrong... there is! sorry!