It is sometimes difficult to evaluate, using decimal differences, several users who have done very well, especially if there is a time lag between publications. I think the healthiest thing is for teachers to evaluate from 1 to 9, and leave 1% as an outstanding factor for the end, according to the teachers' criteria.

Teachers have 1% to award at the end, when they have already analyzed all the positions, that is, they already know which ones have those details that favor them more than the others.