Steemit Crypto Academy Contest Season11 Week04 [SUMMARY] - "Cryptographic News And Events"

image edited on Canva

Divider.png

Introduction

Greetings to everyone. We hope everyone enjoyed participating in the Week04 season11 of our contest which was base on "Cryptographic News And Events". we will be giving our summary of how things went during the contest window and in this summary, we will be discussing about the valid, invalid entries, plagiarism cases, general performance of participants and top3 winners of the contest

For last week, the contest was centered on "Cryptographic News And Events" . In this theme, users where ask to answer the following questions
  • Can news affect cryptocurrency prices?

  • Between technical and Fundamental analysis, which affects the price of an asset most ?

  • Events such as Selling of coins massively, The burning of coins, creating new tools for a blockchain, among others. Does it affect the price of cryptocurrencies? If yes then explain and give us examples

  • Investigate about a news that affected the cryptocurrency market

  • Can crypto market be manipulated? Give your understanding on this

We are delighted to receive wanderful entries to this contest theme as most users demonstrated and showed us their skills and knowledge on it. So far, we have registered a good number of entries during this week and we are glad that most of the entries were great because most of the users brought fourth great articles In regards to this subject area. Without further ado, let's dive directly to the general stats and top3 winners.

Divider.png

General Statistics

For the just-concluded week-04 contest, we received a total of 31 entries within the contest's validity period. There was no invalid article during this week. There was no plagiarism case as well . So we will continue working hard to completely eradicate plagiarism in the Crypto Academy. Henceforth, we hope to continue seeing pure and genuine content creators at this academy and steemit out larg. Let's take a look at the table below.

Total Entries Invalid Entries Plagiarized Content
31 00 00

Performance Distribution

Just like I earlier Said, most entries to this contest were top notch and two entries got a score of 9 and above, 20 entries scored between 8 to 8.9, five entries got the score between 7 to 7.9 and three entries got the score of 5 to 6.9. It was so sad that we registered two entries that felt below 5 which means they didn't perform well in our contest.

However, from the metric above, We would like to encourage users who didn't score too high to improve on their entries and presentation subsequently.

Divider.png

Week3 Top 3 Users

We have come out with our selection of the top 3 users in the last week's contest on understanding the Steem Blockchain. The selection process is not only considered base on scores alone but it's considered base on both scores and general engagement with other participants in the contest.

There are some articles that scored high but didn't engaged with other entries and as such, they were left out of the selection. It should be noted that this is an engagement challenge and we hope users can engage to the best of their ability.

Ranking Username Article
1 @sawera1 Link
2 @casv Link
3 @mile16 Link

Many many congratulations to all the winners of this contest

Divider.png

We hereby appreciate all of you who took part in this contest, your efforts were great and we encourage all those who didn't perform well to try their best subsequently. We also urge y'all to take engagement very serious in other to have a chance of winning. A new contest is running already and we look forward to your participation.

Divider.png

Have a blessed week y'all

Sort:  

@josevas217 and @nahela, I believe you were the individuals who exposed her for posting AI-generated paraphrased content within your community. Based on the content of her post in the crypto community, what are your thoughts? I'm sure it is paraphrased AI-generated content.


ss.png

Link to the Post

PS: @sawera1, if you have something to say, please go ahead; otherwise, kindly admit it and refrain from engaging in such activities, as they are negatively impacting the reputation of our country. I hope you won't do it again. 🙂


Yeah,. That user made the mistake of copying all the text generated by the AI and even the instructions of the AI😜 , an act that left him in full evidence.

I been drunk for 4 years. Lost my STEEMIT login info. That shine is powerful stuff. I was waiting for the page to load. I just kept a drankin and drankin. Next thing I know there is AI stuff everywhere, there is a new president that looks like a possum, didn't the other guy look like a pumpkin, wholly empty beer bottles Batman I was in atime warp drunk stooper for 4 years! Every other word out of peoples mouth is this ChatterTP Ai stuff. Like is it electronic toilet paper or what. Does the roll talk? Does it call out bombs away brfore you take a number two? Help git ol' Jimbo cawt up on the world. I was lost and missing from Steemit for 4 years. Oh fur your information I might be a drunk and sorry as the day is long but I aint no BOT.

SurvivingMars-jimbo.png

After seeing the result announcement post of this contest, I was quite surprised. I wonder if anyone even bothered to read the post of the user whom you have declared the first winner.


1.png


Upon reading the post, it becomes evident that this is a paraphrased AI content, and this user has previously received warnings about plagiarism and AI content. Please take a more fair approach to this, as you are depriving a deserving user of their rightful recognition.


2.png


Cc: @steemcurator01, @pelon53, @kouba01 and @chiabertrand.

 last year (edited)

Screenshot_20230822-064744.jpg

You should stop causing problems here for nothing sir... Before selecting a winner we always carefully go through their posts. This user you claim her content us paraphrase is very innocent. So next time you better do a better research and bring proofs before saying such. Or is it because you weren't selected as one of the winners ???🤔🤔🤔🤔

Besides that, this user haven't been caught with AI generated content in this community.... So I don't know why you will be bringing other incidents into this community whereas the user content was pure and humanly written without the aid of an AI

I was even expecting that you will show is proof of the content being AI generated but you didn't and you were instead telling us of the users past experience in AI contents... Please always bring up issues when you fine clear evidence rather than polluting places without any evidence at hand

CC: Cc: @steemcurator01, @pelon53, @kouba01

Wow, I wasn't expecting such a strong reaction from you.

Or is it because you weren't selected as one of the winners ???🤔🤔🤔🤔

I believe you may not have read my comment carefully.

Please take a more fair approach to this, as you are depriving a deserving user of their rightful recognition.

What does the word "their" imply in these lines? Is it referring to me?

I don't want to engage in pointless argument with you because I don't want you to feel bad. I believe that you neither have an understanding of detectors nor of paraphrased content.

PS: With all due respect, sir, can you please tell me what is meant by abecedarian analysis in crypto? If assistance is needed, you can ask @sawera1, as she has written about it in her post. 😃

Cc: @steemcurator01, @pelon53, @josevas217, @weisser-rabe, @irawandedy and @patjewell.

Can't help myself. 😃

@chiabertrand, a user who commits offenses like the ones @waqarahmadshah has shown with evidence in other communities is a user who will continue to do so in other spaces, but here at the Cryptoacademia, considering that the topics that are developed in general are not the domain of all.

The fact that someone has not been selected as a winner does not imply that they should necessarily react badly, as you suggest that @waqarahmadshah has done, who rather than offending should be thanked for showing what is seen here as a clear abuse of this user, and that you did not notice.

Perhaps assuming a mistake on your part would imply some humility, since neither you nor me nor anyone is perfect. And it is quite clear that in this case you were wrong to select this user as the winner, when it is evident that I use AI.

I dont know what I am doing. I just clicked vote up between dranks. I kint make heads ner tails what is going on here. But I like it

 last year (edited)

Okay sir on it........

Gracias al equipo de la academia por considerar mi post en este gran podio, es un gran honor para mí acompañar a @sawera1 y @mile16 a quienes les envío un gran abrazo de felicitación.
Gracias a todos los participantes.

Whooo. I woke up from a drunk stooper now I can read Spanish. I did not know I could do that. My brain is pickled with shine.

Vaya. Me desperté de una entrada borracha y ahora puedo leer español. No sabía que podía hacer eso. Mi cerebro está encurtido de brillo.

WhatYa-Mean.png

😱🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 vaya vaya! Que feliz me siento, ese momento me hace recordar cuando obtenía mis mejores notas en el colegio, y le sentía satisfecha de investigar, leer y hacer mi tarea con mucho cuidado y compromiso .

Muchísimas gracias por la selección, sé que hubieron muchas entradas buenas así que me siento privilegiada de haber ganado aquí junto a mis compañeros @casv y @sawera1

Ahora queda aplicar todo lo aprendido a la hora de hacer algún movimiento en el criptomercado.

Éxitos y bendiciones a todos y en especial al equipo de criptoacademy

Congratulations to all the winners 🎊🏆