Dear friend, I have always been surprised by people who demand special attention to themselves.
I could just ignore what you wrote in response to my comment on your post.
But I'll try to clarify something.
I can highlight the posts of five members of our community per day.
To date, we have 106 active members. This is not the biggest number, and not every one of them publishes posts every day, but nevertheless ...
When I select 5 posts from the total mass, I focus not only on the number of words or photos (although this is also important).
I often focus on posts that may be of interest to random people who have looked at our platform by tags or in some other way. It's very subjective, but I try to look at the post through their eyes. I may be wrong in my assessment, but this is my guideline.
I might not have opened your post at all and turned my attention to five completely different authors. It's also a kind of lottery.
In addition, there are authors whose posts are certainly of interest. For example, a professional photographer with excellent high-quality photos. Thanks to such photos, outside viewers come here and, perhaps, want to stay. Such posts will receive unconditional support.
The diary game was popular at one time, and it probably still is. This is a good way to increase user activity, but it is unlikely that a guest will come and read how someone woke up, brushed their teeth, ate a sandwich, went to work, returned from work, ate and went to bed. I'm exaggerating a bit, but only to show the point.
Or, for example, a post about a trip to an interesting place with author's photos and emotional personal impressions.
Compare these two examples. Imagine that you are a guest and think about what will interest you more and why.
Hi @steem-for-future,
Thank you for your feedback though we were a bit surprised by your reaction.
A 30% upvote is a sign of support, not something to complain about. Our curators do their best to evaluate posts based on quality, originality, and effort and that support is limited and shared fairly across many authors.
Also, just to clarify:
You are not part of the CCS curation trail, but you are already receiving daily rewards from @suntr based on your generous 9.5K SP delegation which we deeply appreciate. 🙏
Let’s all keep in mind that gratitude and respect go a long way in building a healthy community.
Thanks for being part of the journey!
I have no complaints against the community. I just commented out of curiosity. Of course, our good attitude will strengthen the community. I am with the CCS community, God willing. This is a wonderful topic, I express my gratitude and thanks for your beautiful explanation.
Hi @steem-for-future,
Just to put things into perspective regarding your recent comment:
Let's compare your two recent posts:
The feeling of eating spicy muri... (CCS Community)
– Reward: 2.083 STU ($1.37)
– Plus daily payout from @suntr: 3.611 STEEM ($0.65)
– Total estimated income: ~$2.02
CotinaHelp – Health tips & veggie recipe (CotinaHelp Community)
– Reward: 1.755 STU (~$1.36)
– No additional payout
– Total estimated income: ~$1.36
As you can see, the post in the CCS community, which received a 30% upvote, actually brought you a significantly higher total reward thanks to both the curation and your delegation-based payout from @suntr.
We truly appreciate your delegation, but fair curation should always be based on quality and balance and appreciation goes a long way in keeping our community strong and respectful.
Very low-quality support 😞
Dear friend, I have always been surprised by people who demand special attention to themselves.
I could just ignore what you wrote in response to my comment on your post.
But I'll try to clarify something.
I can highlight the posts of five members of our community per day.
To date, we have 106 active members. This is not the biggest number, and not every one of them publishes posts every day, but nevertheless ...
When I select 5 posts from the total mass, I focus not only on the number of words or photos (although this is also important).
I often focus on posts that may be of interest to random people who have looked at our platform by tags or in some other way. It's very subjective, but I try to look at the post through their eyes. I may be wrong in my assessment, but this is my guideline.
I might not have opened your post at all and turned my attention to five completely different authors. It's also a kind of lottery.
In addition, there are authors whose posts are certainly of interest. For example, a professional photographer with excellent high-quality photos. Thanks to such photos, outside viewers come here and, perhaps, want to stay. Such posts will receive unconditional support.
The diary game was popular at one time, and it probably still is. This is a good way to increase user activity, but it is unlikely that a guest will come and read how someone woke up, brushed their teeth, ate a sandwich, went to work, returned from work, ate and went to bed. I'm exaggerating a bit, but only to show the point.
Or, for example, a post about a trip to an interesting place with author's photos and emotional personal impressions.
Compare these two examples. Imagine that you are a guest and think about what will interest you more and why.
I hope I have clarified my position for you)
I was curious about this.I have already changed my mind and I have realized my mistake.I would like to request you to kindly avoid this matter.
🖐 😊 👌
💐🫶❤️
Hi @steem-for-future,
Thank you for your feedback though we were a bit surprised by your reaction.
A 30% upvote is a sign of support, not something to complain about. Our curators do their best to evaluate posts based on quality, originality, and effort and that support is limited and shared fairly across many authors.
Also, just to clarify:
You are not part of the CCS curation trail, but you are already receiving daily rewards from @suntr based on your generous 9.5K SP delegation which we deeply appreciate. 🙏
Let’s all keep in mind that gratitude and respect go a long way in building a healthy community.
Thanks for being part of the journey!
I have no complaints against the community. I just commented out of curiosity. Of course, our good attitude will strengthen the community. I am with the CCS community, God willing. This is a wonderful topic, I express my gratitude and thanks for your beautiful explanation.
Hi @steem-for-future,
Just to put things into perspective regarding your recent comment:
Let's compare your two recent posts:
The feeling of eating spicy muri... (CCS Community)
– Reward: 2.083 STU ($1.37)
– Plus daily payout from @suntr: 3.611 STEEM ($0.65)
– Total estimated income: ~$2.02
CotinaHelp – Health tips & veggie recipe (CotinaHelp Community)
– Reward: 1.755 STU (~$1.36)
– No additional payout
– Total estimated income: ~$1.36
As you can see, the post in the CCS community, which received a 30% upvote, actually brought you a significantly higher total reward thanks to both the curation and your delegation-based payout from @suntr.
We truly appreciate your delegation, but fair curation should always be based on quality and balance and appreciation goes a long way in keeping our community strong and respectful.
Thank you for your understanding.
You explained it very well. Thank you very much for clearing up the matter.Thank you very much for informing me about this matter.
I love #ccs community!!