Dear friend, I have always been surprised by people who demand special attention to themselves.
I could just ignore what you wrote in response to my comment on your post.
But I'll try to clarify something.

I can highlight the posts of five members of our community per day.
To date, we have 106 active members. This is not the biggest number, and not every one of them publishes posts every day, but nevertheless ...
When I select 5 posts from the total mass, I focus not only on the number of words or photos (although this is also important).
I often focus on posts that may be of interest to random people who have looked at our platform by tags or in some other way. It's very subjective, but I try to look at the post through their eyes. I may be wrong in my assessment, but this is my guideline.
I might not have opened your post at all and turned my attention to five completely different authors. It's also a kind of lottery.
In addition, there are authors whose posts are certainly of interest. For example, a professional photographer with excellent high-quality photos. Thanks to such photos, outside viewers come here and, perhaps, want to stay. Such posts will receive unconditional support.

The diary game was popular at one time, and it probably still is. This is a good way to increase user activity, but it is unlikely that a guest will come and read how someone woke up, brushed their teeth, ate a sandwich, went to work, returned from work, ate and went to bed. I'm exaggerating a bit, but only to show the point.
Or, for example, a post about a trip to an interesting place with author's photos and emotional personal impressions.
Compare these two examples. Imagine that you are a guest and think about what will interest you more and why.

I hope I have clarified my position for you)