You know that I am a very modest person and I don't like to praise myself very much. But now that I have read the interview again, I think that there are many interesting aspects in it that the vast majority of users who appeared on the Steem after February 2020 do not (can not) know. But you should know them before you consider the Steem (or even all three blockchains), as a pure "money printing machine". I think more users should know about the background, which is why I promoted our article. By the way, /promoted is the better method than #burnsteem for me. With a transfer to @null (which sometimes maybe hurts a bit) one decides - preferably another user - consciously, which article is really worth reading for others (the daily breakfast egg is not...).

In addition, I have a remark: at the end of your interviews you link the previous showcases. You number them. I tell you: No one reads that afterwards. You should write the names of the users you interviewed behind them. But avoid mentions - that's just annoying. Just put the nick without @, maybe in bold.

It's nice to see you going the right path - keep it up!