Is the delegation system harm for the platform?
People want to earn anything in a short way and for this reason in the blockchain based social media platforms we see the delegation system. At the starting of steemit i saw every users got support easily from everyone doesn't matter that user is small or big. This thing motivates small users to keep working on this type platform. Before investing anywhere what a small user need? I think they need to know what the authority is giving opportunity for any new users or think how much he can get profit from it. There are always these two sides to think. After years i saw there was give and take system, you gave me liquid and i give you more upvote and with that you can have some profit. It continued for a long time and after that there the delegation system came i think. People share their power and get upvote for the delegation. In one side this is good for the users who delegate power that if he is a busy person and hard to continue every day, he can just share a post and get the upvote but i don’t like it. With the delegation system the new users face trouble at the starting. All users delegate their power and don’t have anything to support anyone and the person who gets the delegation he curates only the delegated persons and for this reason the new users cannot get upvotes properly. In blurt @ctime curates every post that shared on blurt in a percentage.
Please forgive me if i write anything wrong and i am being apology for mentioning you guys. Have a good day.