You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The artist was in her X period...
Inam not sure if I ask questions, this is more what I notice and can't understand + stand.
No one knows except for the creator what inspired him or her or if that was simply nothing. Being labelled might be funny if it brings money, but it also takes the essence of art away. It is up to the viewer to decide what is seen and felt.
🍀❤️
@wakeupkitty
The eternal relationship between the artist and the viewer...
there is another sad point here. The consumption model that is being imposed on society is working successfully. Are there many viewers who are able to fully appreciate what they see? Who forms the culture of perception of the viewer, his tastes, preferences?...
Very often it's fashion in one form or another. What is in the "trend" is bought, and the artist is left with a choice: to be in the trend and create for the consumer, or to stay true to himself. I think that some artists work "on two fronts". Something purely for sale, something for the soul. But after all, kitsch is sold under his name and the artist is also judged by him.
Everything is complicated... )
=============
Вечные взаимоотношения художника и зрителя...
Тут есть ещё один печальный момент. Модель потребления, которая навязывается обществу, успешно работает. Много ли зрителей, способных в полной мере оценить то, что они видят? Кто формирует культуру восприятия зрителя, его вкусы, предпочтения?...
Очень часто это мода в том или ином виде. Покупается то, что в "тренде" и художнику остаётся выбор: быть в тренде и создавать для потребителя или остаться верным себе. Думаю, что некоторые художники работают "на два фронта". Что-то чисто для продажи, что-то для души. Но ведь китч продаётся под его именем и по нему тоже судят о художнике.
Всё сложно... )
0.00 SBD,
0.13 STEEM,
0.13 SP
As things stand, we’ll all soon be out of money. At the moment, the most important thing for most people is to pay the rent or the mortgage; then comes the car, if it’s needed; then the internet and food. For many, art – just like going out – is a luxury, and this is where savings will be made first (along with pets). What remains then is: free art, simply because there is no longer any demand. Or who knows, perhaps people will start investing their own time in something creative.
I was talking about something else, but I agree that the basic needs for food and safety have not been canceled. Money is also needed to purchase creative materials.
This is not clear. History knows many names of artists who "worked in the basket" during their lifetime. No one knew them and no one bought their works. But they were real freelance artists. Perhaps that's why they created what their muse gave them, inspiration. They didn't create for the sake of fashion or the audience. They were often misunderstood by their contemporaries.
But yes, there are few such creators.
This is exactly what I meant to say. Without money, there's no need left to create on comment like a factory. Those artists left will create what they like.