You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Rembrandthuis - Amsterdam

in ᴀʀᴛ & ᴀʀᴛɪꜱᴛꜱ • 21 days ago

He was obsessed with art. He probably spent whole days on it. First making sketches, then etching; of course, he had to make the paint himself too, and by the time you’ve done that, a couple of hours have already gone by before you can even start. On top of that, he was a collector of foreign items, even though he never left the country. So everything you see – including foreign animals – he simply obtained from pictures, souvenirs or taxidermied animals belonging to others, which he also claimed as his own. I reckon the garden was full in no time, and in winter there wouldn’t have been much daylight to get much done anyway. He replaced his wife with the housekeeper – with whom he was also having an affair – and then had her locked up in an institution so he could start a relationship with the next housekeeper, with whom he had a child. I think you can safely assume that the world revolved around him, and his front garden soon fell into disrepair; he was heavily in debt and had to leave the house. It seems to me that this must have caused him a great deal of stress, as this was the house where he’d lived with his wife for a few years. I believe he also sold – or was forced to sell – the painting of her, and that the one on display now is a forgery by someone else.

Sort:  

So he was a hoarder. Reminded me of the articles I read some time ago. There was this lady in Singapore that help those people clear those stuffs. Mostly useless things. At least this artist hoarded valuable things that can be sell off. But he really was a jerk. Discarding the woman like that!

He certainly was, and I don’t think we can blame the turpentine for that. Nor can we blame it for the fact that his wife died a few years later. He also cheated his best friend out of a fair bit of money, despite the fact that, through his own fault, he had lost a great deal of capital and suffered a significant loss of standing on a personal level. He was lucky to have a wife and a son who set up an art gallery for him, and that his son Titus was able to cope with his behaviour, unlike many others. But you know how it goes – the same applies to all the other celebrities these days: you can beat people to a pulp or murder them and still get away with it, as long as it’s well-produced. It doesn’t matter whether it’s music, painting or boxing.

He was so lucky that he lived at a time where people don't simply divorce or the child emancipate from difficult parents.

We all know the stories of badly behaving people that could get away with murder.