"How appropriate is it for daughters demand a share in their father's property after marriage?"
Incredible India Community |
|---|
Hello My Steemain Friends ,
How are you. I hope you people of steemian are good and enjoy your life . Well I am well. May God bless you all. Today I am writing about an interesting topic is "How appropriate is it for daughters demand a share in their father's property after marriage?" So, in this post I am going to share my point of view about this topic. I am going to share with you.
The issue of whether daughters should demand a share in their father's property after marriage is a very sensitive one. My personal opinion is that daughters should not demand a share in their father's property after marriage. Because parents marry their daughters and follow their give-and-take, customs, and traditions throughout their lives, daughters should not demand a share in their father's property.
One should not usurp the rights of their brothers, but yes, if the father's estate is substantial and the brothers also have wealth, and if something has happened to the daughters or they do not have a husband, then in such a situation, they should ask for a share in their father's property to support their children and support themselves. It would not be wrong to ask for a share in their father's property.
Many people may disagree with me, but when it comes to property, to sharing, the daughter and son-in-law come forward, claiming that they too have a share.
But when it comes to caring for their parents, serving them during their illness, and cleaning up their mess, where are these daughters and sons-in-law? Why aren't they present?
Only sons are there to care for them during illness. Why do daughters and sons-in-law always come to ask for their share? When the property needs to be painted or repaired, it costs money. Brothers contribute, but why don't daughters contribute? And when the same house is sold or shares are divided between two brothers, the daughter stands up to claim it.
So, I never understand the logic behind why daughters want an equal share, so why do they hold back from taking on equal responsibilities? I'm a daughter, too, but I wouldn't even dream of demanding a share in my father's estate, whether it's a small or a large one. Because my brothers have always stood by me through thick and thin; they are my greatest asset.
There's a difference in thinking, because I've seen that when daughters ask for a share in their father's estate, their brothers and sisters-in-law give them their share. But then they break all ties with them for life, and those daughters remain very proud at that time. But a time comes when they yearn for their parents' home, tears flow, and there's no one to invite them back. All I want to say is, think carefully and keep the nuances of relationships in mind before making any decision.
I would like to invite my three friends @sur-riti , @sduttaskitchen , @ninapenda
Thankyou 🙏
.jpg)



Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.
Thank you @aviral123
You invited me to this wonderful topic.
First of all, I would like to tell you that girls do not need to ask for a share in their father's/mother's property after their death; they are legal shareholders under the new rules.
Now, when it comes to values, I like your idea that girls should not claim a share in their father's property. But this is only acceptable if, after the parents' death, brothers and sisters-in-law respect their married or unmarried sisters and fulfill the duties assigned to them by their parents.
But after marriage, brothers do as their wives say.
This is a topic of considerable debate, and only Indians can have such views on this.
Thank you @aviral123
You invited me to this wonderful topic.
First of all, I would like to tell you that girls do not need to ask for a share in their father's/mother's property after their death; they are legal shareholders under the new rules.
Now, when it comes to values, I like your idea that girls should not claim a share in their father's property. But this is only acceptable if, after the parents' death, brothers and sisters-in-law respect their married or unmarried sisters and fulfill the duties assigned to them by their parents.
But after marriage, brothers do as their wives say.
This is a topic of considerable debate, and only Indians can have such views on this.
First of all, thank you for sharing your thoughts on this topic.
I completely agree with you that after marriage, brothers tend to obey their wives.
But there's another aspect to this: if the sister is from a good, wealthy family, and the brother is poor. They haven't settled down, and the sister is very wealthy, is it right for her to demand property rights, or even take them, even if she has legal rights?
Then it seems to me that neither the father nor the brother is greater, but money is the greatest.
Relationships are based solely on money. There's no love, understanding, or emotional connection. Everything is money.