You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Suggested universal rules - how to react for the plagiarism and abuse

I don't think it's a good idea. On a platform where there are so many authors who delegate STEEM POWER in order to receive upvotes, starting a downvote trail could be self-destructive.
There are very few accounts with so much STEEM POWER that if they decided to punish those who downvote other members' posts, many steemians would leave this platform. Already many steemians have left and others are still leaving Steemit because even after creating good content, they haven't received enough upvotes and support.

Sort:  

It won't be about downvoting everyone who is using the bid bots though. It's about downvoting abusers, account farmers and those who use the bid bots, sharing exclusively copy-paste trash. Downvoting does not have to include 50 whale accounts at the same time. Finally, downvote trail that would include 50-100 users is partially protecting from the revenge downvotes. In my opinion Status Quo is bad.

I'm happy to say that other two communities just joined us. We are currently in 6, will be more. Project didn't even properly start yet.

Thank you for the reply!
I understand what you say.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 59445.54
ETH 2993.81
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.74